this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
205 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2722 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is obviously better than Russia, but it ought to be a wake up call to remove dependency on gas altogether.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately the latest budget indicates they're not going to hurry up any transition.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Then what should they do when Norway starts invading Sweden, they have done it before in 1064!

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Norway could buy Sweden, if they wanted to. 😉

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That would be seen as a hostile takeover 😄

[–] PrinzMegahertz@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Nah, our government is run by a free market party, they would never oppose to someone buying something with money

[–] 5200@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Good, part of the Union, mutual defense pacts.. there is plenty of reasons to think this is a good step.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Except for climate reasons, or even the generally beneficial goal of energy independence for its own sake.

[–] 5200@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Norway is a powerhouse by its own rights and its good that they can choose this path if that's what suits their country best. It's also good that the EU was setup to accommodate arrangements like this.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

No but they are in the Schengen Zone so they have strong economic ties with the EU

[–] 5200@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And they are part of the unified European market. So they have all the obligations of being an EU member without any of the voting rights. Plus they pay to be member as well.

Autonomy has its price I guess.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Countries wouldn't do it if it wasn't worth it

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Now Austria, my country, follow suit please, you love copying Germany so please do that here too

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

Transitioning to renewables would be better, but if we need to depend on one country, I can't think of one better to rely on than Norway.