this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
747 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mercedes-Benz debuts turquoise exterior lights to indicate the car is self-driving | A visual indicator for other drivers::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 136 points 10 months ago (37 children)

If we need warning lights for self driving cars, the technology is not ready.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 88 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Eh, it's probably good to have regardless?

It's less about being careful around the car and more about how you might interact with it. For example, honking the horn or flashing your beams wouldn't have the same effect. On that note, it might be nice to have some way of telling a self driving car to temporarily use elevated sensors or something, the same way a horn tells a driver that something is wrong. As long as there's a way to prevent abuse of the system

I don't know much about these lights, but we COULD use some new standards in general with how many things have changed with cars in recent years. Brake lights on electric vehicles being another thing to consider.

That "gentle horn" everyone wants being another

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Gentle horn" sounds like a 80s romantic pop song.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 51 points 10 months ago

Here you go

Gentle Horn

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 56 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As a Level 3 system, the driver is permitted to take their hands off the wheel, their feet off the pedals, and divert their attention away from the road. [...]

The turquoise markers will alert other drivers to the fact that your vehicle is driving itself, so hopefully they won't be alarmed if they see you doing other things while behind the wheel.

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Okay that is the first argument for it I've read that actually makes sense

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

warning lights

Lol, this is like calling the turn signals warning lights. Letting others know something about your driving isn't a warning, it's just an indicator.

[–] Postcard64@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

To play the devil's advocate: early cars needed a guy with a flag im front of them because people were used to horses and carriages and not automobiles. After a while that stopped being a thing.

But yeah, self driving cars are not really ready.

[–] Junkers_Klunker@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Id argue that motorized carriages back then werent ready for the public.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If we need signs saying student driver, the driver is not ready

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If we need signs saying "Baby on Board", the driver isn't ready

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 115 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's actually a fantastic idea

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Aye, credit where it's due; this is a great way to differentiate between human and machine controlled devices. It's detectable by both, and can help in cases where people blame the autodrive, or car companies claim human error.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 94 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I for one would like to know when another car isn't being driven by a human.

[–] Steve@communick.news 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Eventually the reverse will be equally important. So this will be a good idea for decades at least.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] adaveinthelife@lemmy.ca 66 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Just seeing a turn signal on a Mercedes or BMW is enough for me to assume the driver isn't the one in control.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Good idea I think, but these could be mistaken for reversing lights

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (6 children)

On that note, can we talk about how shit a lot of reverse lights are? In addition to indicating that you're backing up, they're also supposed to function as a sort of rear-facing headlight so you can see what your backing up towards, but their size, placement, and brightness on a lot of cars makes them pretty much useless for that in a lot of cases.

I'm not saying they need to be as bright as your regular headlights, that would be serious overkill, but they should probably be noticeably brighter than a turquoise self-driving indicator light would ever need to be.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Found Alec's Lemmy account

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe light placement is more important?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin 53 points 10 months ago (13 children)

Even if this would be a good idea, you can't just put some non regulated lights on a car. This would need a law change in Germany to be approved and would probably take years of burocrazy until she get beards figured out the exact hue these lights need to emit. But I guess Mercedes already wrote that law for our government to copy. How convenient.

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Since it's Mercedes-Benz doing it, they'll just write the new law themselves and tell the German minister of traffic to push it through.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

But I guess Mercedes already wrote that law for our government to copy. How convenient.

How dare a company try to work with governments to create a new safety feature!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 24 points 10 months ago

Either way, it's a useful starting point for the conversation to be had I guess.

Better for some proactivity then nobody ever progressing anything, right?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

No law change needed, the StZVO is a mere decree. Also EU law takes precedence Mercedes probably isn't even going to bother getting it through German bureaucracy but will go straight to Brussels.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So should companies not try to innovate or invent things until the German government tells them it's ok?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Seems like a bad idea - you know someone is going to figure out how to take advantage of that.

  • Scofflaw - ai has no pride or ego so I can cut them off at will and they will always back down
  • scammer - manufacturer has deep pockets - where’s my neck brace?
[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 16 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I'm sorry, but I can't actually imagine that happening where I live.
Do people who cut others off care who's driving?

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

He's referring to a group of people they intentionally cut others off and slam on the brakes to induce an accident that they can sue over. And it happens a lot. Dash cams are saviors.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Do the same thing, but hook it up to a camera that detects if your eyes are on the road lol.

[–] KredeSeraf@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most FSD cars have that. People just ignore the warnings and popups.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The car should pull over then. Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was just thinking, gosh, it's been awhile since a new car signal dropped. This is a super interesting idea - not sure if it's a GOOD idea but seems worth exploring

[–] ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I think it's a pretty good idea, at least for this period of transition towards self-driving vehicles. I think it's useful information for other drivers to know that the vehicle is being controlled by a computer and not a real human.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Brb, wiring up a set of these so I can blame the car for missing a speed sign

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ULS@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Watch this turn into a status thing that starts trending.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (6 children)

As someone living in a country which haven't seen any self-driving cars I'd just be a lot more cautious/careful if I'd ever get close to anything with those lights.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Wow I’ve been thinking about that for a while now. We should be able to tell when someone is driving or an Ai is.

[–] feecoomeeq@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it would be also cool to have an indicator if the car in front of you has cruise control on

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This could be useful as a communication medium where the car transmits data through the light to the neighbours.

[–] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 29 points 10 months ago (3 children)

If only there was some kind of universal communication technology that didn't require line of sight, worked over distances out to say 100m and was reasonably inexpensive to implement...then we wouldn't need to communicate using the modern equivalent of semaphore.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›