this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
18 points (90.9% liked)

Fantasy General

298 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Interestingly, the author of this piece completely fails to mention The Amazing Maurice.

Possibly because this article is completely based on another article from 2021, which is before Maurice came out.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 1 year ago

I think the article is correct. Pratchett shines in his narration and commentary. The dialogue was never too pithy or impactful on its own. Quoth The Raven is an example, great name, great narration, the dialogue was okay.

To the point about the footnotes and bolding of certain characters and words, it works pretty well in the audiobooks. Still carries the same impact, they just use great narration to make it happen.

Going off topic a little bit, I think if you're creating a movie or a show, and you hire these great actors, you want to use them. You want to get your money's worth from the screen time. You don't want to have a narrator doing most of it not focusing on your very expensive actors. I think that might be the tendency, so Pratchett gets lost in translation

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 4 points 1 year ago

I'm trying to remember which books Sky did TV adaptions for. I think it was the first 2, then hogfather and gone postal?

I think those were all at least ok, with hogfather being the best.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for sharing!