this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023

555 points (84.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers

56 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

LemmyMemes: Memes
LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

2. Be civil

Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.

Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.

Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.

Bigotry will not be tolerated.

These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.

3. Post Linux-related content

Including Unix and BSD.

Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.

No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.

4. No recent reposts

Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

poopsmith@lemmy.world

zephyr@lemmy.world

rtxn@lemmy.world

555

which ones do you think I missed? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 10 months ago by lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

170 comments fedilink hide all child comments

image transcription:

big collage of people captioned, "the only people I wouldn't have minded being billionaires"
names(and a bit of info, which is not included in the collage) of people in collage(from top left, row-wise):

Alexandra Elbakyan, creator of Sci-Hub. perhaps the single-most important person in the scientific community regarding access to research papers.
Linus Torvalds, creator of linux kernel and git, courtesy of which we have GNU/Linux.
David Revoy, french artist famous for his pepper&carrot, a libre webcomic. inspiration for artists who are into free software movement
Richard Stallman, arch-hacker who started it all. founded the GNU project, free software movement, Emacs, GCC, GPL, concept of copyleft, among many other things. champions for free software to this day(is undergoing treatment for cancer at the moment).
Jean-Baptiste Kempf, president of VLC media player for 2 decades now
Ian Murdock, founder of Debian GNU/Linux and Debian manifesto. died too soon.
Alexis Kauffmann, creator of framasoft, a French nonprofit organisation that champions free software. known for providing alternatives to centralised services, notable one being framapad and peertube.
Aaron Swartz, a brilliant programmer who created RSS, markdown, creative commons, and is known for his involvement in creation of reddit. he also died too soon.
Bram Moolenaar, creator of vim, a charityware.

on the bottom right is the text reading, "plus the thousands of free software enthusiasts working tirelessly."

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Cralder@feddit.nu 294 points 10 months ago (22 children)

It's nice to appreciate people who do good things, but keep in mind that the only way people become billionaires is by exploiting people. So I would not want any of these people to be billionaires because it would mean they got that wealth not by doing good things, but by owning ridiculous amounts of capital and exploiting people.

Rant over, sorry.

[–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 10 months ago

it's alright mate. your rant helped me see things in a different light. so thank you.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well said. Thinking billionaires are assholes because they're naturally shitty is like thinking they got rich by being naturally hard working.

Take landlords for example. You can be the nicest person in the world. The kind of person who makes friends with the tenant. What do you think happens to you after you've evicted a few of your friends?

Systems are a bitch.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I could see someone making something useful and selling it to billions of people at a fair price not being exploitative and also being a billionaire.

I think it's rare to the point of maybe happening once ever, but I'm not super upset about the behavior of the guy currently bankrolling the signal foundation.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The problem is if you aren't exploitative then you aren't being as "efficient" (in a capitalist sense) so you'll be out-competed. The system is designed to incentivize exploitation. It's mis-aligned to do anything else.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (19 replies)

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 103 points 10 months ago (1 children)

None of them. I don't care who they are, nobody should be a billionaire.

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The point is, I think, if they were to become billionaires (say Bll Gtes leaves it to them in his will), then they wouldn't be billionaires for long -- their moral compasses (given they've spent their lives on non-profit causes) dictate that they'd likely put the money into other non-profit ventures.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Thats a fair point, but money changes people. That kind of money is obscene because it effectively puts you above most laws. I, too, would like to believe that the folks on this list would do only good with the money; but the longer the list, the more likely you witness the “Bad Change!” At the end of the day, most folks have families and other concerns outside of their public pursuits. That kind of money, while bringing its own problems, can get rid of just about any “normal people” worries (obviously not something like inoperable cancer)!

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 93 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think they aren't billionaires precisely because they worked for the good of the internet/knowledge.

If they indeed became billionaires that would imply that how they conduct themselves had completely been altered along with their core beliefs.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You literally can't be a billionaire without exploiting people. If you're not sharing profits equitably, you're exploiting your work force; if you ARE sharing profits, then there's no way you'll become a billionaire.

[–] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago

I heard of a shorter way of saying that: There is no ethical billion dollars.

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 90 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nope, there should not be any! Fuck capitalism!

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (3 children)

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] m13@lemmy.world 73 points 10 months ago

None of these people could ever be billionaires. Only a sociopathic, narcissistic mind could ever do what it takes to hoard a billion dollars. Capitalism rewards having a lack of empathy for other people.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 71 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of this tweet from Merman_Melville: "Being a billionaire must be insane. You can buy new teeth, new skin. All your chairs cost 20,000 dollars and weigh 2,000 pounds. Your life is just a series of your own preferences. In terms of cognitive impairment it's probably like being kicked in the head by a horse every day" The experience itself is probably harmful and changes the person.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Studies have shown that people change at a certain amount of money, like they cross a line in the sand. When you can buy anything everything just becomes yours by default in your mind. And anyone who can't do that are basically sheep dogs - useful but not worth your time. These studies were done in the twenty-tens and the number then was between 20 and 30 million for most people. Imagine your view on the world if you have 100 times that amount.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Whew! Dodged that bullet.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago (11 children)

You need to be a horrible person to become a billionaire.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You need to be a horrible person to become a billionaire

And to STAY a billionaire. If you have immense power to do good, and every single morning you wake and choose not to, you are an evil ghoul driven by greed, period.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I love how so many of them demand love and acclaim for claiming they will give their money away... when they die.

You want me to sing your praises because you won't use the money you made exploiting countless laborers and lobbying government to benefit yourself above society to anoint a handful of nepo babies to wield that power after you as some part of a new nepo dynasty? Gee thanks?

Its like a serial killer promising not to train his children in the family business. Its not doing good, just doing slightly less bad. Except billionaires cause damage on a far greater scale.

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 58 points 10 months ago (8 children)

If they were billionaires, they likely wouldn't be the people they are today.

load more comments (8 replies)

[–] g33z@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Image of me is missing but I still agree.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] hersh 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple.

I don't think he was ever a billionaire, though he's certainly done quite well for himself. Since leaving Apple, he has founded several new companies and projects, focusing a lot on education and philanthropy. He was also involved in founding the EFF.

He's an engineer first and foremost, and several of his projects never achieved mainstream success, partly for being, IMHO, ahead of their time -- for example, a programmable universal remote in the 80s, and a GPS-based item tracker in the early 2000s.

As far as I know, he has never been involved in any notable scandals.

[–] turbodrooler@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

At Apple’s IPO, Woz gave $10 million of his stocks to Apple employees. Jobs didn’t want to give any to employees. Seems like a good guy.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

on the bottom right is the text reading, “plus the thousands of free software enthusiasts working tirelessly.”

We don't work tirelessly. We get tired all the time, but keep at it as well as we can.

[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can we throw Steve Irwin in here. I bet that dude could have saved the Great Barrier Reef and a whole lot of wildlife if he had more means.

[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

This is exactly why those people never become billionaires. You can't make billions without screwing over people and the environment.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

RIP Aaron Swartz.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 23 points 10 months ago

Rip Swartz man, the idea of all human knowledge from how to change your tire to how to put out a fire being monetised is legitimately scary

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

No one should have that much power.

I wouldn't have trusted Fred Rogers with a billion dollars, and he's practically the only famous stranger I could have seen trusting with my newborn alone.

It's a society warping level of wealth. No single, unelected, unaccountable person should possess that much uniltateral power.

The global ~~allowance~~ encouragement of such an exploitative, reckless goal is why we are in our various bleak situations.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But of course, such based individuals will never be billionaires. Specifically because their basedness precludes them from being psychopathic enough to commit the kind of cutthroat, violent exploitation of tens of thousands of workers' labor inherently necessary to amass such wealth.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I have a standing theory that once a person is no longer concerned about their welfare or the welfare of their descendants, they go crazy.

Like, once you reach a point where survival is no longer a problem, that part of your brain goes nuts. It's not a flawless theory, since philanthropy is a thing and people like Dean Kamen exist, but it's a thing that seems to happen an awful lot.

[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think it’s more that billionaires have very few people to surround themselves with except for sycophants and other billionaires.

Nobody says no to them, everything they’ve ever done was the right thing according to everyone around them, so why should the next thing they do or say be wrong?

Covid really really accelerated the craziness among them.

[–] outcide@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I've worked for several very, very rich men. The pattern I notice is that they always get surrounded by people who make sure that they never, ever hear "no".

Imagine living in a world where every inane thing that comes out of your mouth, somebody immediately makes it their mission to try and make it happen. You no longer get any kind of useful feedback from the world and your opportunities to learn from feedback are greatly reduced.

I agree, I think in the end, it does make them crazy.

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] krondo@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Me. I use arch btw.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 months ago

yeah, no

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Richard Stallman

Are you sure about that one?

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

- me. i wouldn't mind being a billionaire. now give me money /s

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

Aspiring to becoming and staying a billionaire requires a certain amount of psychopathy because it takes a certain mentality to want to own so much wealth that you'll never be able to enjoy all of it in a lifetime while at the same time denying or taking away the wealth of others who might need it.

If I had a billion, I'd take a few million and live off the interest and give away the rest and not be bothered by anyone or anything ever again.

[–] beSyl@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Aaron Swartz created markdown?!! I did not know that!

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments