this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
118 points (96.1% liked)

News

22890 readers
3648 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Patriotic mobs and harbor tea-dumping returned to Boston on Saturday as the city marked the 250th anniversary of the revolutionary protest that preceded America’s independence.

The commemoration of the Boston Tea Party included scheduled reenactments of the throwing of tea leaves into the city’s harbor and community meetings that preceded the defiant act on Dec. 16, 1773 — though this time, the symbolic protest was aided by spotlights and microphones. City officials were expecting thousands of visitors for the celebration.

Crowds who gathered to watch the reenactment quickly joined in, shouting “Huzzah!” along with the costumed actors as boxes of tea were dumped in the harbor. Later, they resoundingly booed an actor who read King George III’s order closing the bay, and they cheered as narrators detailed the drafting of the Declaration of Independence.

Tea for the reenactment was supplied by the East India Co., the same British company that was at the center of the raucous dispute.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Funny... based on the photo they appear to be dressed like colonial Americans.

But the Tea Partiers weren't dressed like that.

For some reason, they were dressed like indigenous Americans.

Can't imagine why this reenactment left that key detail out.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

The second image in the carousel is a drawing of the event, which shows the Tea Partiers wielding what looks like tomahawks.

Didn't come up in the article tho.

[–] Haagel@lemmings.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You seem to know the history well. Why were the Tea Partiers dressed like indigenous people?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Plausible deniability.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago
[–] ExLisper@linux.community 2 points 9 months ago

Ashamed of your history? Don't worry, just whitewash it and pretend the ugly parts didn't happen. Now you can be proud again! Hurray!

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are you looking at a different photo than I am? Because they're dressed normally in the AP article

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I was going to upload a screenshot of the image to show you but apparently image uploads are temporarily disabled on lemmy.world

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm sick and tired of it being called the 'American Revolution'. More like the "American under new management".

The rebellion was started over taxes to pay for a war, and the first thing the new government did was put down a rebellion started over taxes to pay for the war. We just traded one George for another and saved Americans from the subjugation and horror suffered by Canadians and Australians.

The truth is that England defeated all the European powers that could threaten the colonies and America said thanks for defending us, it's made you weak and us strong, now guess what?

The French, the Haitians, and the Bolsheviks knew how to throw a proper revolution.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

The Haitian revolt while initially successful led to nothing but utter tragedy and disaster that continues to affect the country to this day. France extorted them into a debt that couldn't possibly be paid, and multiple other parties (including American banks that still currently exist) got in on the action. Haiti overthrew its slave masters and broke their chains only to spend most of its history with its former master's boot on its throat.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

saved Americans from the subjugation and horror suffered by Canadians and Australians.

I'm sorry but I'm going to need a credible source from you to backup this claim and more clarification and context

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Today I learned the East India Co. Still exists!

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are you kidding me? Of course it does. Too big to fail, ever.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I thought that would be the case, but I never hear anything about it ever apart from in a historical context.

I also would have expected a rebrand or two due to said history.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

According to Wikipedia it dissolved in 1874. In what form does it still exist?

[–] yui@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If BBC is to be believed, it's been surviving as practically just a name until 2005, when it was acquired by an Indian entrepreneur and turned into a luxury goods seller.

Yahoo seems to corroborate that this is the company in question.

Looks like this is their site: https://www.theeastindiacompany.com/

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago

So it isn't really related to the treacherous east India trade company, just has the same name. It's cool that the company name is owned by an actual Indian for a change.

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Read the article buddy.

Tea for the reenactment was supplied by the East India Co., the same British company that was at the center of the raucous dispute.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

But it was dissolved in 1874 pal.

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The real master of puppet behind Trump, not Vlad!

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

OK, I'm not American so I guess this hits differently, but it was a dispute about TAX. Like JFC

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It was a dispute about colonial representation. Taxation was the lens by which representation was questioned.

Well, for the most part.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Reading up on the boston tea party is fascinating. Apparently, colonists were angry that their tea was too cheap.

Really sets the stage for the next 250 years of American politics. The working class believes making their rulers richer the fastest at their own expense is a good thing.

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Nothing says entitled so much as throwing a valuable commodity into the ocean to celebrate someone who did the same thing for much more important reasons centuries ago. Could've just thrown empty boxes but they just wasted a tonne of tea for no reason.

[–] key@lemmy.keychat.org 1 points 9 months ago

Tea for the reenactment was supplied by the East India Co., the same British company that was at the center of the raucous dispute.

This isn't true. The EIC from 250 years ago disbanded in the mid-1800s. The modern EIC is a totally separate company founded by an Indian guy around a decade ago as a luxury consumer brand.