this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
457 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

15218 readers
2119 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 58 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

So many publications are not worth reading.

Im all in for a revolution of science.

No more bullshitting. No "800 words" required.

If youre able to explain something in 5 sentences and put a table and plot with the results. Do it. No need to elaborate in 5 pages how fucked up your ability is to use thesaurus for synonyms.

Edit. Usually i read the headline and put the article into my bibtex library.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Agreed. The worst part to write for me are always the fucking "introduction"s, explain why we did this, why it deserves your attention and a lot of addedd fluff. I did it because I wanted to. Read it if you are interested, go away if not.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

I had this problem for my bachelor thesis. I used some other paper about machine learning and changed some parameters. Others I didn't touch because I didn't knew what they do. Now I have to explain why I copied those parameters. I just wrote in testing they proved to be the best.

Yes I totally agreee.

[–] jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

5 pages?!??! In my discipline, we spend five pages just kissing reviewer 2’s behind and begging people to take an interest. Then we spend 20 pages citing everyone and their adviser and their adviser’s second cousin on the off chance that they’re married to reviewer 2. Then you get a copy-paste of the documentation of one of the five datasets that everyone uses.

Ive read about such stories. Must be awful.

Im sorry for you. That really sucks.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, sometimes I get to read the abstract and the conclusions. And then I get a deserved week off.

[–] weariedfae@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't forget the first thing you do!

Skim the figures.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

True, true.

[–] HootinNHollerin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Upper management material

[–] teft@startrek.website 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I read the summary of the abstract that a journalist with no science degree wrote.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I read abstract.


This comment has been summarized. The original (15 words) has been reduced by 80%.

This comment was made by a human, and if it was helpful please reply to it with "good human".

[–] teft@startrek.website 13 points 2 years ago

"good human"

[–] Bademantel@feddit.de 21 points 2 years ago

I asked ChatGPT to summarize the article and write my essay about it.

-- Thank you

[–] BertieWooster@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've added it to zotero. I'll read it later when I have time

[–] sid64@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Don't do this to me.

[–] bleistift2@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

I skimmed the headline.

[–] bastian_5@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I tried to download the PDF but then I just got errors...

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I read a Facebook post