this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
40 points (93.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4082 readers
304 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Asked if the Nectar prices were genuine discounts, Roberts said: “They’re absolutely genuine great value prices for customers, what this is about is rewarding loyal customers.

“Is it a genuine discount?”

“Its genuine great value!”

So, no, they aren’t genuine discounts. Absolutely cop out avoid the question

[–] Fake4000@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's because his/her data isn't included. The decision would be different if that data included his/her shopping history.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's no fun for the guardian. Gotta get those clicks with controversial misleading headlines. Totally not a tabloid, totally....

What this article fails to explain is what exactly they are selling and how that is matched up to groups of users. It also fails to explain how advertising is linked to anonymous users at the other end and how throughout all of this it's just a random ID they are targeting rather than Mr Phillips from Doncaster. It doesn't explain at all the mechanism to do this because it doesn't match the narrative they want to push of outrage. It only mentions it in passing and of you don't already know how these things work you're still none the wiser.

Never stop being the guardian, never stop. 😂🤣😂.

[–] Gazumi@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

A defence that will create long tern harm to users. Will trash mine and shop elsewhere

[–] snacks@feddit.uk 4 points 11 months ago

its good that they mention facebook at the end, the largest data selling company on earth. Whatsapp, Insta and FB already have you nailed down. I wonder what the story really is here, a hit job on Nectar by the guardian dosnt really ring anyones bells

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 11 months ago

what we hear from customers, they don’t want to be sent lots of marketing and media messages that aren’t relevant to them

Yeah sure, if you phrased it as "do you want all the spam or slightly less spam?", if you'd been honest and said "do you want us to track you and sell the data to the highest bidder?" then a few more people would have your you to fuck off. I'd like you to sell me the products I actually want and fuck off with every advert full stop, but one step at a time, eh?

[–] DoneItDuncan@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

You know, they don't actually check the address or name you put in when registering for a nectar card. Imagine what would happen if enough people accidentally put the wrong details in there - I can't imagine the data would be worth as much if it's mostly nonsense.