this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
34 points (92.5% liked)

Hacker News

4123 readers
3 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nonsense. They want all the data to themselves and want a subscription to sell.

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 10 months ago

dont forget the paid map updates!

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They have stability issues that manifest themselves as bad connections, poor rendering, slow responses, and dropped connections.

Yeah, you know what's funny? The built in systems have these problems even worse, which is exactly what drives people to use the phone based alternative instead.

And when CarPlay and Android Auto have issues, drivers pick up their phones again, taking their eyes off the road and totally defeating the purpose of these phone-mirroring programs.

Okay, and somehow using the built in ones, which always get cheaper hardware and less development resources, which always perform much much worse, doesn't cause people to pick up their phones?

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's funny because all of those issues are problems with GM and not carplay. I have after market car play and have had literally 0 issues

The only okay built in systems I have used were from Lexus and Infiniti, but even then they were only okay

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So they’re going to spend countless millions developing one that’s better? How exactly are they going to solve the problems they suggested? Are they going to invent a better USB cable? Reinvent Bluetooth?

[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're going to develop a system that they have control over rather than Apple or Google so they have access to the user data and usage metrics.

If they actually cared about the safety impact of these types of systems they'd be putting physical buttons back into their cars, not bigger touch screens.

[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Agreed entirely. I just find their excuses thin

[–] HolyDiver@aussie.zone 11 points 10 months ago

but no problem making 2 metre tall pickup trucks that are designed to kill pedestrians with ease, be unable to see children at all and blind drivers going in the opposite direction

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Well, that means I will be dropping GM.

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Dude, I really just want a nice adjustable mount for the phone. These things don't do what I want or else stop doing it randomly in the middle of the ride, requiring reconnecting and reset. I know how to use and not use my phone.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

This is total bull shit. The data stays on your phone. Like another commented said, GM wants the data and they don't want to pay Apple and Google