this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
96 points (92.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3738 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden goes into next year’s election with a vexing challenge: Just as the U.S. economy is getting stronger, people are still feeling horrible about it.

Pollsters and economists say there has never been as wide a gap between the underlying health of the economy and public perception. The divergence could be a decisive factor in whether the Democrat secures a second term next year. Republicans are seizing on the dissatisfaction to skewer Biden, while the White House is finding less success as it tries to highlight economic progress.

“Things are getting better and people think things are going to get worse — and that’s the most dangerous piece of this,” said Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, who has worked with Biden. Lake said voters no longer want to just see inflation rates fall — rather, they want an outright decline in prices, something that last happened on a large scale during the Great Depression.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darganon@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I make $17k more than I did in 2016, but according to the inflation calculator, I make $15k less than I did in 2016.

The underlying health and future prospects of the economy being positive is great, but things are just eye wateringly expensive compared to a few years ago.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

When the economy is doing well, that means businesses are doing well. When businesses do well, the workers are paid less. The economy is not your friend.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Or some people like to say “the stock market is not the economy”. Which I think points in the same general direction.

[–] BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is that a median or a mean?

[–] BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I believe average but I'm not sure that's particularly relevant here. We're talking about wages, not wealth. It's the latter that your Bezos's, Zucks, etc can potentially throw off when measuring averages.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Still, it would be interesting to see the distribution of these wages, whether the whole distribution shifted uniformly to increase the average, or it just became more skewed

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I believe average

I was asking about which specific kind of average.

[–] BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I can only go by the words that you use when you ask a question my guy, and the words you used indicated that you were asking if it was the average (mean) OR the middle figure in the distribution of incomes (median).

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Average" can mean either mean, median, or mode. You're the one who doesn't know what words mean, not me.

[–] BeeRadTheMadLad@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Regardless of whether that's technically true, the context in my initial comment made it clear that the answer to your question is "mean", did it not? I specifically cited those wealthy outliers to exclude median since outliers wouldn't change a median value, after all.

[–] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 38 points 11 months ago

Good news guys, shareholders are profiting again!! At least be happy for them you ingrates

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 35 points 11 months ago

Income inequality has made traditional measures of the economy meaningless for the majority of us. Even the overall measures of price increases and inflation no longer apply across the board because categories that are less important can cancel out areas that are critical, such as housing and food costs.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 8 points 11 months ago

Neolibs and the right: The economy is better than ever, why aren't the people happy?

The People: I'll never be able to afford a house, I can barely afford my rent and feed myself.

Neolibs and the right: Two men in suits standing in front of a display showing a line chart, with text overlayed that says "But the chart says!!!".

[–] Destraight@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The economy is not solid when I'm unable to purchase a week amount of groceries

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

The middle class are often the last to feel economic prosperity. Feature, not a bug.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

What is frustrating is the framing we keep seeing being set up by the corporate media - people keep being given a moral framework and permission structure to vote for what is likely to be the end of the country, by voting against Biden (or sitting out, or voting for an absurd third party candidate) just because they feel gas or groceries are too high. As if the President sets prices.

I'm not saying this permission structure is all that new. It's been there, just like the stupid "who would you like to have a beer with?" narratives...I'm just saying continuing this horse race stuff is absolutely not helping. I get that people are struggling, but voting for OJ is not going to help their situation and the media often frames it that way. And of course we know that many are absolutely not struggling, in fact, many are doing better, but they are now given excuses to vote for donnie that give cover for the real reason they are voting for him (racism).

[–] jerome@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Americans are so fucking stupid. Source: I'm from Ohio.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“Consumers have been feeling broadly uneasy about the economy since the pandemic, and they are still coming to grips with the notion that we are not returning to the pre-pandemic ‘normal,’” Joanne Hsu, director and chief economist of the survey, said of the overall trend in recent months.

Jared Bernstein, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, stressed that a strong underlying economy is “absolutely necessary” to eventually lifting consumer sentiment.

As the annual inflation rate has fallen, GOP messaging has focused instead on multi-year increases in consumer prices without necessarily factoring in wage gains.

Administration officials had once assumed that better economic numbers would overcome any doubts among voters, only to find that the negativity stayed even as the U.S. economy became likely to avoid a recession once forecasted by economists.

As a result, there’s a lag before a slowing rate of inflation boosts how consumers feel, according to a recent analysis by the economists Ryan Cummings and Neale Mahoney.

Adjusting for government transfers and taxes, the average annual income for someone in the lower half of earners was $34,800 when Biden took office, according to an analysis provided by Gabriel Zucman, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley.


The original article contains 1,343 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago

According to who?

[–] mydude@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

C'ommon, fat. You really have it great. I have no sympathy for you, I really don't. Get another job or I will give you another crime bill to cry about.