Atheism

1662 readers

1 users here now

Be respectful to other members Treat others with kindness and courtesy, even if you disagree with their opinions.
Stay on topic Keep your discussions relevant to the purpose of the forum. Avoid going off-topic or derailing conversations.
No spamming Avoid posting irrelevant or unnecessary content, advertisements, or links to unrelated websites.
Use proper language and tone Choose your words carefully when commenting or replying to others. Avoid using profanity or engaging in offensive language and personal attacks.
Do not share personal information Protect your privacy by refraining from sharing personal details such as addresses, phone numbers, or email addresses on the forum.
Report any issues If you come across any inappropriate behavior or content, report it to the forum moderators or administrators.
Have fun and contribute positively Participate actively and add value to the discussions. Engage in meaningful and constructive conversations with fellow members.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

atheist@feddit.de

Are Religious People more Moral than Atheists? Here are the Facts | Phil Zuckerman (youtu.be)

submitted 11 months ago by Zacryon@feddit.de to c/atheism@feddit.de

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An overview of studies which investigate correlations between morality and religious vs. secular / atheist ideologies presented by Phil Zuckerman who is a professor of sociology and secular studies at the Claremont colleges in California, USA.

Summary: Atheists / secular people not only have morals but are even more moral than religious people.

Note: Of course moral is a matter of perspective. In this context we agree that compassion and empathy are our foundations of moral.

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

One of those groups tends to be inappropriate around children too..

[–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

And in other news, the sky is blue!

[+] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world -27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just reading your overview tells me that this is nothing.

The assumption of morality just sums it up. Let's assume morality is defined by following the word of God, then you have to flip the chart, because under your definition, I'm very moral, but under the other, I'm not.

Most people want to be moral and they're going to see themselves in their preferred light of morality.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say that this is nothing, but I agree with the remaining part of your comment.

Of course this could be flipped (although I wonder how racism for example can be justified under christian teachings). Considering that a large amount of people live by similar moral frameworks which are rooted in emotions like compassion and empathy and even serve as the basis of legislation, I think it's a meaningful choice of measure.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm guessing I got downvotes because people assumed that I believe that those are not good markers for morality. I agree completely that they are good markers, but setting the definition of X to match what you think and then say "I'm better at x than you because you do it differently!" is not a fair argument.

Leave the word tricks for those who need them.