They did fake the moon landing. Problem is Kubrick is such a stickler for detail that he insisted they shoot on location.
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
559 points (98.8% liked)
Risa
6918 readers
9 users here now
Star Trek memes and shitposts
Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
No, no, Kubrick hated shooting on location. All those Vietnam scenes in Full Metal Jacket..? Filmed right next to London.
Now, he did fake the moon landing, of course, that's why NASA gave him the lens he used to make every single frame in Barry Lyndon look like a period painting... but much like with the start of 2001 (also filmed in London), he wanted lots of location pictures for reference (he didn't want to go there, wherever it was, but he had no qualms whatsoever about sending other people), so he demanded NASA send astronauts to the moon anyway to take those pictures, and the official moon landing was faked using those pictures taken in the real one as reference.
Classic
If Barry Lyndon was any indication, he would have def gotten the natural light spot on.
Kind of a boring movie, but goddamn is it gorgeous.
And do you know how he managed to make every frame in that film look like a period painting..? A very particular and expensive lens NASA gave him.
(Of course, though, while the man despised filming on location, he required massive amounts of reference pictures to build his sets, so even though the official moon landing was fake, NASA still had to get some astronauts there first to take those pictures for him.)
There's a really fun mockumentary called Dark Side of the Moon which plays it (almost) totally straight about Stanley Kubrick faking the moon landing until the end credits when it shows all the "experts" cracking up. Really worth a watch if you can find it. It's French but was filmed in English.
There's a very low-quality version on YouTube. Not sure where else you can find it.
I just spent an hour watching this (instead of working, thank you FlyingSquid). This is amazing! That's some exquisite editing!
No problem. I'm sorry I couldn't link to a higher quality version. I don't remember how I got a copy but I don't have it anymore.
To fake the moon landing, the government hired Stanley Kubrick. Kubrick, being a perfectionist, made it look real by filming on location.
Location shooting is proving to actually be more cost effective in many circumstances as well. Kubrick knew his stuff.
Pretty much the lamest conspiracy theory. There are better ones like Rhode Island is actually the third largest state in the US but the other states are trying to keep it down.
I'm still waiting for the Birds Aren't Real people to reach through the generations to become a liberal conspiracy.
Dont tell me you are one of those people who who are so naive they ACTUALLY believe humans came up with that Birds Aren’t Real conspiracy? Lol some people can’t see the truth when it is right there screaming in their face. It is clearly a crow psy-op campaign to distract humanity from uncovering their preparations for crowmeggedon. We are running out of time to raise people’s awareness, we have to speak up before the only ones left to speak have beaks….
The SFX artists of the Corridor Crew said it would be more expensive and more difficult to fake the moon landing than to actually land on the moon.
Your forgetting about the 5G. They only want you to believe it was in 69. It was really more like 2169
It was AI Area 51 is just a giant CRAY