this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2023
55 points (96.6% liked)

Linux

56121 readers
1575 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Linus' thread: (CW: bigotry and racism in the comments) https://social.kernel.org/notice/AWSXomDbvdxKgOxVAm (you need to scroll down, i can't seem to link to the comment in the screenshot)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eighty@lemmy.one 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I can relate to the "how the fuck is being a concerned human being extreme/poltical?" energy in the post hard.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Hate is mainstream politics now, sadly. So yes, not hating is political as well.

[–] paaviloinen@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

That's what "being political" means. Otherwise you'd be apathetic, cynical and not concerned about anything.

[–] flibbertigibbet@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Political? For everyone outside of America that's just common sense.

[–] LlamaSutra@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

In Canada it’s starting to become “political” since our morons are egged on by the morons down south.

[–] xyon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Hello I'm a trans person from the UK here to tell you this is sadly not the case at all.

[–] caribou@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Politics used to be something people engaged in. Now politics is the core to a lot of people's identities, which means disagreement or debate is perceived as a personal attack and people will embrace a tremendous amount of cognitive dissonance to avoid being wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Linus gives exactly zero fucks about saying exactly what's on his mind. And it's almost always massively based. He's always been great about that, we don't deserve such a great mind.

[–] CrownCrafter@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Remember the time with the anti vaxxer, man was firing with all cylinders

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Plasma@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

FOSS is an active political statement!

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Was just coming here to say that. The entire Ethos of Open Source is basically the people owning the digital means of production. So some people really not grasp that?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bobslaede@feddit.dk 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I don't see how his, very reasonable, views makes Linux itself (more?) political. What is the point of this post?

[–] Andreas@feddit.dk 1 points 2 years ago

Gloating? Complaining? I thought the FOSS community has matured past "creator's views = views of everyone who uses their creation", honestly. And isn't Linus supporting the Democratic party already well known?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xenago@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Linus has always been political and principled, I mean he chose the GPL for a reason! Glad to see him state all of this outright though, it only makes me respect him more.

[–] roda@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

Woman right to choose, fair enough. Regulated guns, absolutely. The less guns the better. Gay people stuff, I couldn't care less. Check.

The man said it as it should be said.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Couldn't agree more.

[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Linus delivering the well-deserved beatdown as always.

[–] Puls3@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

One great thing about about software is you don't have to agree with or care about what the creators thoughts and beliefs are, software is at the end of the day just software.

Doesn't get any less political than that.

[–] JasBC@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

One great thing about about software is you don't have to agree with or care about what the creators thoughts and beliefs are, software is at the end of the day just software.

It really isn't though - no-one dared touch ReiserFS after the creator became a wife-murderer even though it, supposedly at the time, it was quite the piece of advanced code.

[–] Puls3@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Was referring more to people trying to politicize software and push them into political movements they're unrelated to. Open software is at is core free and as such anyone with any political leaning could use it or contribute to it and no one would know, and no one should care.

[–] paaviloinen@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Now, what one considers free is political. You cannot decouple reality from politics, and the free software movement is just one very specific example how political this really is. It's also these communities that generate politival movements that you may see as unrelated to the pieces of software in question.

[–] ravermeister@lemmy.rimkus.it 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I create software by myself and disagree. First it's very political where and for whom I choose to develop software. Second, software is always made for a purpose and the purpose can be indeed (and is) very often linked to political or social cause. E.g. a software which only purpose is to harm people, say for controlling mass destruction weapons is in my point of view a very political software

[–] Puls3@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

software is always made for a purpose and the purpose can be indeed (and is) very often linked to political or social cause

Its not though, typically software exists to serve a basic function at its core, and it could be used or contributed to by anyone for any number of things.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SolNine@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Incredibly sensible take on all accounts in my opinion! I share all of the same opinions, though I lack the platform to be listened too haha.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 1 points 2 years ago

Linus apitting facts

[–] NotSteve_@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

It makes me very happy to hear Linus say this

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Linus is stellar example of "good is not nice."

He will rake you over the coals because he cares about quality and expects better from everyone.

[–] raccoon@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hard fisagree. Linux isn't political. Everyone has an opinion, it's obvious Linus would too. But I am pretty happy that his opinion is one I personally agree with. Linux can be uaed by anyone though, and nothing stops far right activists (terrorists) from making a distro, which would still be Linux. There's a heavily religious distro too, but that doesn't make Linux as a whole religious.

[–] raresbears@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Does that really make it totally apolitical though?. Like obviously it's not inherently attached to a wide reaching political ideology, but it still is political in the same way that any free software is kind of political.

[–] raccoon@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Personally I disagree but that's ok, we can't all see it the same way :)

[–] paaviloinen@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Personal is political.

[–] FiskFisk33@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

All sensible points, nothing extreme, except maybe the Linus trademark super blunt delivery

[–] matir@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I've never been made happier by one of his rants.

[–] Jaximus@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Hahahahahaha this is great

[–] jackenhack@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

And he's right!

[–] k_o_t@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

comrade linus 🫡🫡

but also he’s finnish, which is communist, so he’s obviously a communist smh 🤷‍♀️

[–] _calm_bomb_@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know if you joke or not, but thinking finnish = communist is too far away from any truth. I lived and still live in an ex-communist country and let me tell you: nothing Linus says or does is communist in any way. Socialist? Maybe! But that's a different discussion.

[–] k_o_t@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

it’s a joke 😉

[–] subca@opensocial.at 1 points 2 years ago

@juergen @k_o_t A paranoic fascist here.

[–] raubarno@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  1. ~~He's not Finnish, he's a Swede from Finland. Please attribute the nationality correctly.~~
  2. He's not defending communists. He just points out that 'woke' is a word used in a spiritual context, which doesn't make sense with communism. The header of this thread is a clickbait. Read the article again.

EDIT: He's actually a Swedish-speaking Finnish guy, mea culpa.

[–] eoli3n@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

social.kernel.org : one should migrate to lemmy :°

[–] Viktorian@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Linus is just such a treat. Love the guy.

load more comments
view more: next ›