this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
95 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19136 readers
2221 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

His reascension, as nominee or the eventual winner, threatens to spark the same clashes with the Hill GOP that took a heavy toll on the party.

Congressional Republicans are steeling themselves for a return to daily life with Donald Trump — which means constant, uncomfortable questions about his erratic policy whims and political attacks.

With Trump far ahead of the GOP primary pack and leading President Joe Biden in some polls, Republicans are getting a preview of future shellshock akin to their experiences in 2016 and his presidency. It’s likely to continue for the next 11 months. And perhaps four more years after that.

Trump’s recent call to replace the Affordable Care Act is triggering a particularly unwelcome sense of deja vu within the GOP. Even as many Senate Republicans steered away from Trump over the past couple years, now they’re increasingly resigned to another general election that could inundate them with the former president’s often fact-averse and hyperbolic statements.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 52 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The GOP has had multiple chances to rid themselves of him and each time they chose to hug him closer.

The cowards can sink with him.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Let's also not forget that even before Trump came along at all the Republican party was an irredeemable pile of shitheads. People like Mitt Romney, Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, etc. were all in for years on sabotaging the government to make Democratic lawmakers look bad, stealing court seats, attacking people's voting rights, etc., and that's just recent memory. They all should have been unelectable since the 60s for things Goldwater and Nixon did.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Exactly. There was a time (before Trump) where I thought that the GOP could shake off the crazy and return to being a sane(ish) political party. Maybe not right on most issues, but at least supportive of democracy.

That time has long since passed. Their last opportunity was after January 6th. The Republicans could have located their spines, said "this is not okay," and could have tossed Trump from the party along with anyone who excused his insurrection attempt. Instead, they acted like they might do this for a couple of weeks before hugging Trump even closer.

They've embraced the crazy instead of tossing it aside and now they are stuck with it. May the entire party sink into obscurity known only by history students and really old folks who tell their grandkids about when a major political party tried to overthrow the elections. (And may those grandkids not believe us old folks because democracy is so strong that such a thing is unthinkable.)

[–] teft@startrek.website 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When you chain yourself to a turd don’t be surprised when you come up covered in shit.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah, one of the rare shit-turds...

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the monster they created and they did nothing for so long.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They did worse than nothing: they actively refused to hold him accountable for his actions.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Exactly this. Mitch McConnell claimed that impeachment wasn't appropriate because the court of law would be the better venue. Now, Trump's lawyers are arguing that the court of law isn't the appropriate venue, impeachment was.

It all basically seems to boil down to "however you try to hold Trump accountable, it's the wrong way!"

(But impeaching Joe Biden over a theory with zero evidence is totally fine to the Republicans.)

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

These guys literally came out of hiding on 01/06 and still voted to not certify. Think on that.