this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
687 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

58135 readers
4438 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceiphas@feddit.de 140 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You say that targetting only the top 5% restricts the adoption rate. Consider me shocked...

[–] harry_balzac@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's almost as if consumers influence markets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

There are several EVs out now for under $50k, and a few under $40k, so things are improving.

[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 9 months ago (7 children)

alternatively we could get rid of car dependency

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 61 points 9 months ago

That's fine for people who live in cities (which I acknowledge is a lot of people), but for people who live in smaller more remote and more rural places, it will never be possible to fullly be free of personal vehicles.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I feel like that ship has sailed in the US. Both for practical/economical reasons and because will resist. If half the people fought against wearing masks to protect vulnerable people from covid, good luck getting them to give up their "single family home with a yard + 2 cars” lifestyle. For those fortunate enough to have a single family home, that is.

I’m not saying it SHOULD be this way, and I’m not arguing against reducing cars with public transit and walkable/bikeable towns. However, from my perspective inside suburbia that borders rural areas, electrification of vehicles and supplying the grid with renewables is 1000x more likely as the path to fix this stuff environmentally.

And to get rid of cars for non-environmental reasons, I think that will be even more difficult. I mean, I visited Sweden earlier this year and for all the progressive stuff they’re way ahead of us on, there are still cars everywhere. They are smaller, more sensible cars with a much larger proportion being electric, but cars just the same.

[–] TheHotze@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Start small, support deregulating zoning so people can build more dense housing, and small corner shops in residential areas, that way it's not so far to go places. Support bike lanes so people can ride safely if they want to ride. Support work from home to prevent people from having to go anywhere in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FapFlop@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Think of the shareholders!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eronth@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I just want more car options and less truck/SUV options

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 22 points 9 months ago (5 children)

hear hear.

I want to buy a honda plug-in hybrid.

they only make a fucking SUV plug-in hybrid.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 54 points 9 months ago (12 children)

This is exactly what I want, I don't need 300 miles of range, I don't need luxury entertainment systems. I need a simple vehicle with decently comfortable seats and a shitty Walmart $80 bluetooth head unit. In Europe and various parts of China / Japan you can get a small electric vehicle for like 8,000 US dollars and that's what I want here God damn it

[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Honestly that would be great - make the head unit similar to a car from '07/'08 and then if we want to upgrade it wity something aftermarket, we can. Then we can choose what bells and whistles we want.

No autopilot, not internet connected BS. Heck I'd even go without adaptive cruise control and lane assist.

07/08 really was one of the best eras for car interior, because the head units weren't usually integrated into the dash, meaning you didn't have to replace trim pieces with your unit in order to upgrade the damned stereo.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (5 children)

300 is more than I need, but I do want 200 miles of range.

I would absolutely buy the Mini if I could expect to go over a hundred miles from 80-20% for 10 years, but with a 110 mile range on day one, that just isn't happening. The 2025 model is rumored to have increased range. If that's the case, I'll probably get one.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] rab@lemmy.ca 41 points 9 months ago

Ya there's literally no way for poor people to buy EVs even if they wanted to. Another huge issue is poor people live in apartments and can't charge EVs at home either.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We, the consumers, have also been saying that. Like, for a while.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes - but a quick glance at the insane profit margins on large SUVs/trucks will tell you why this sadly hasn't happened.

Something's gotta give though...

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Og VW Beetle, but aluminum and EV please.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm so confused why they don't sell the id4 as a sporty hatchback and call it the GEI or something. It's the same platform, just tweak the suspension and add some more beefy motors, kinda like the whole idea behind the GTI

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 11 points 9 months ago

Because then people will stop buying the combustion cars, with which they make more money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The problem is they're also adding all this other shit that adds up costs. Just make a car, but it doesn't use gasoline. That's it.

[–] indigomirage@lemmy.ca 24 points 9 months ago (11 children)

I got a barebones Chevy Bolt. Simple car - absolutely perfect for the city at times when public transport isn't an option.

What's more - it has AndroidAuto/Carplay (mandatory in any future car purchase for me).

GM subsequently cancelled the model (though rumours say they'll bring it back?) and are building bigger cars instead. Ridiculous.

What we need is a smaller, practical EVs and a robust charging infrastructure. (especially in condos/rentals)

[–] thoughts3rased@sopuli.xyz 9 points 9 months ago

Similar experience from a European.

I own a 2015 Vauxhall Adam. It's a brilliant little petrol car, 3 doors, very small and very reliable.

GM canned the model in 2019. It makes no sense to me, if they had stuck a battery in it for an electric version I'd have been sold in a heartbeat.

But no, GM wants to focus on big cars that I don't want. I don't want anything bigger than a 3 door hatchback, I'm only 20 and have no kids, why do I need some massive fuckoff SUV????

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 30 points 9 months ago (5 children)

They are giving americans what they want. The real problem is continuing to feed the deep rooted car addiction brought on by lobbying and corporate greed. There has not been a better time to instead invest heavily on public transportation, build extension inter-state, inter-city train systems, subway or rail systems for cities. Overtime phasing out freeways and replacing them walkable districts. I understand this won't happen over night and cities like Houston and LA are sprawling cities of 100s of miles but it needs to start somewhere and it starts with heavy investment from the federal government. Time to finally invest the tax money back to the taxpayers not defense, wars (direct, proxy or funded) and foreign affairs in the name of "national security". How about domestic security from corporate greed, price gouging, poor education, horrible Healthcare are system, costly drug prices to say the least. I understand for all these there's need to be a massive social change booth in the country and in the world's largest retirement home, US Congress.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They aren't. They are making larger vehicles to keep up with the demands for fuel efficiency (in gasoline vehicles) and max range in electric vehicles because of NHTSA regulations.

There absolutely have been better times to invest in public transit and expansion of transit systems. You require skilled man power for those things. Not just to build them but to upkeep them. And we're at a time where there are a lot of things that will need to be fixed first or we won't be able to have nice things. The mental health crisis for one, and homelessness/ rising housing costs for another. Adding infrastructure skyrockets the cost of living making affordable housing farther out of reach, and that adds fuel to the fire where the mental health crisis is concerned. You touch on corporate greed but you don't outright say we need more regulation. We do. But to get it we have to have people to enforce it. We don't have that either.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Shortbus@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I can't be the only one who has noticed the uptick in the negative EV press lately. Is this the same death throws akin to the buggy whip lobby of yore?

Edit* price needs to be attainable for the many for sure.. but the amount of negative press is "sus" (as the kids say)

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago

People are genuinely unimpressed with the high prices and low range numbers on what are supposed to be the next generation of vehicles. Volume and tech advancement were supposed to make them cheap and practical, but all that's gone up is the price.

Especially with talk of banning the sale of gas vehicles in the fairly near future, they are going to have to do a lot better than this or a lot of people are just going to end up without any vehicle at all.

Myself living in a rural, cold climate, 200km from any major center, nobody has made any practical vehicle for me yet. I even already own an EV, but it's really just a powerful golf cart. Once it gets much below freezing, I'm lucky to make it to a neighbour's place and back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (10 children)

Everytime I consider buying an EV I do some research and they always seem to have all of the bells and whistles. Then I get to price and it’s like $60,000+ and I can’t help but wonder how much cheaper it could be without all of the added features.

Edit: I’m not going to reply to everyone and I really should have mentioned since it’s not immediately obvious but I’m Australian. No Chevy volt and and all vehicles are imported increasing prices on top of the usual AUD imbalance.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This. Just this, so much. How much would a battery, an electric engine and safety shit cost?

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

I've seen conversion kits for old trucks under $10k. So there's your answer.

Unfortunately said kits are often lacking in range unless you're willing to fill your truck box with batteries, because you can't really retrofit a "skateboard" style battery.

I literally want that skateboard with seats and a steering wheel. Hell, give me a diesel burning heater and a washer fluid bulb I have to stomp on like I have in my old truck, I'm not picky

[–] capital@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I just bought a used 2022 Polestar 2 under 20k miles for $35k.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, cheaper and smaller cars across the board would be nice. Everything is a fucking tank now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Lithium ion battery technology is not a good fit with the type of vehicles we currently produce. The energy density is nowhere near fossil fuels and this implies a big battery, which also adds mass. By 2027, Land Rover and other makers of SUV will be nudging 3000kg for some of their models.

IMHO the only viable solution for li-ion is ultralight vehicles. Bicycles and Velomobiles are light enough to get decent range at speed. A bicycle used with integrated high speed rail would solve most of our commuting problems. The fact is, whether you are making tailpipe emissions or not, F=ma. Moving a 3t mass around for one person is always going to use an extravagant amount of energy and that energy has to come from somewhere.

Work from home, eat less meat, make fewer journeys, use a bike more often, make fewer children. Those are some things most of us can do.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 13 points 9 months ago

Yes the energy density is less, but the efficiency is better. ICE wastes like 2/3 of that extra energy. Still has more, but 1/3 that you might think.

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Blame the manufacturers and our obsession with driving land whales, not the batteries.

A Tesla Model 3 SR+ was almost the same weight as a Toyota Camry hybrid of similar shape and size.

EVs should weigh 2-300kg more at most

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I understand that automakers don't want to make plug-in hybrids because of the complexity, but mine has served me well and most of the time I can stay within the electric range (where sometimes I go a whole year without having to fill up on gas). With my use case, it's actually better for the environment than a full EV since the battery doesn't have to be so huge.

Regardless, if these automakers don't get their act together, they're going to be destroyed by cheap Chinese EVs, just like how US automakers got destroyed by Japanese vehicles during the oil embargo and periods of high gas prices. Maybe they'll just lobby the government to lock out the Chinese competition one way or another.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nbafantest@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Donald Trumps tariffs have been a disaster

There are great EVs out there but trump blocked them. We have all lost out

[–] Redfugee@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I saw in Asia there is a Chinese EV, I think the brand is Wuling, for about ~13-15k with about 180 miles of range. Small car but perfect for local driving.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 8 points 9 months ago

Wuling and BYD absolutely dominates cheap EV segment in Asia. Their small EVs basically cost almost a quarter of Hyundai Ioniq 5.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or, ya know, invest in battery tech so it's more convenient to charge cars and push for gas stations and parking lots to all have chargers.

[–] outrageousmatter@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

or make the battery replaceable

[–] a9249@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Nissan leaf.... IS FIFTY GRAND?! +custom charger +shit range.... yeah I'll keep my 10yr old dino burning corolla mate.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

That's actually what they did before the Tesla, and the result was the cars were so useless nobody wanted to buy them.
Most carmakers make small subcompact EVs, and they are way more useful now, but even Dacia Spring which is probably the cheapest European made EV, isn't competitive against similar sized or prized ICE cars. And frankly it's a very unattractive car in many ways IMO.
ICE cars have a century of iterations and optimizations on cost effective production and efficiency, it will take a while longer to get the EVs to the same level.
Batteries are getting both cheaper and better and safer, so there is no doubt EVs will ultimately surpass ICE in probably every segment.

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Attractiveness is an interesting point; it would be interesting to see a “boring” normal looking car that doesn’t lean into the somewhat polarizing EV aesthetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Or people need to give up the idea of taking three tons of metal to work with them every day.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Best thing for consumers and environmental would be conversion. We already have the cars. I like my 2003 Golf. I won't be getting rid of it until I need to.

Why replace 8 billion cars when we can convert them. Yeah they won't be nearly as efficient but it's a stop gap between scrapping that many cars. Also I can't afford a new ev. I need a small run around with 259 miles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blademax@lemmy.one 10 points 9 months ago

Auto Dealers : (adds "Market Adjustment" $$$ to offset the cheaper EV prices...) "Hey, why no one buy EV? We need a bail out!"

/s

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 9 points 9 months ago (13 children)

It's almost like the people who buy EVs are doing it to save money.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›