this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
140 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58795 readers
3413 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Report: Apple to end partnership with bank that backs Apple Card, savings accounts::Goldman Sachs has lost billions of dollars on its consumer-focused businesses.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hth@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Apple is probably not going to partner with anyone because they're becoming the bank

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That is a LOT harder done than said. Apple might have the resources, but they don't have the time or focus to become an actual bank.

They'll just go to some other bank, willing to take on the shittier client risk. Probably Citi or the GE/Synchrony bank. Capital One if they smile real nice and bring flowers.

[–] troybot@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah they have a physical storefront in every state so, as a bank, they would need to follow the specific financial laws of each state. Gets super complicated because you end up with different interest rates depending on where the customer lives.

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 8 points 10 months ago

Even if they decided to do it themselves, they'd spin up a subsidiary to do the actual banking. No way Apple would want their retail stores having to live up the the rather strict standards of banks.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

They are in no position to handle the regulation and scrutiny that would involve. It's never worth it.

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

"Bank that backs Apple Card"? People don't know what Goldman "vampire squid" Sachs is anymore?

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So what happens to all the people with thousands of dollars in their saving account with apple / gold man ballsack?

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I accept your bedazzled man bags

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But even if those products have proven reasonably popular with consumers, they haven’t been working out for the bank that Apple has partnered with to supply those services.

Goldman Sachs’ consumer services have been losing the company billions of dollars, according to reporting from Bloomberg, CNBC, and The New York Times, among others.

The financial losses seem like the biggest point of contention between the companies, but the WSJ also reports that Apple has frustrated Goldman Sachs execs by demanding that most people who apply for an Apple Card get approved, and that all Apple Card customers receive their bills on the same day (banks typically try to spread these bills out to avoid a deluge of customer service calls).

Executives also partly blame Apple for regulatory issues that Goldman has had with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Reserve.

“The award-winning Apple Card has seen a great reception from consumers, and we will continue to innovate and deliver the best tools and services for them."

Providing services like the Apple Card has become more important to Apple's bottom line in recent years, as revenue growth from the iPhone, iPad, Mac, and other hardware businesses has slowed or flatlined.


The original article contains 486 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago

When the card launched, I remember reading that Apple was keen to put their finger on the scales when deciding whether or not somebody was offered credit through Apple. Their logic, I assume, was that the increased profits would offset the increased risk.

This appears not to have been the case.