this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
111 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5212 readers
502 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
111
Increasing taxes on polluting activities and cutting fossil fuel subsidies could generate trillions of dollars to tackle climate change, an advisory panel to the COP28 talks in Dubai said. (www.reuters.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived copy of the article

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I feel like.. this is obvious.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Burning money and giving it away leads to lack of money. More tonight at 11.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

You'd be surprised...

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Since the US will still want to promote domestic oil production for national security, maybe they can start taxing foreign oil more heavy rather than propping up domestic oil? That way they still get security, but oil prices also go up likely decreasing consumption.

[–] sweetcuppincakes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I hope the world's decision-makers listen to this panel. We need to take drastic measures, starting with the common-sense solution of taxing destructive things and using the money for additional solutions to the climate crisis.