this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5246 readers
329 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gbagginsthe3rd@aussie.zone 6 points 11 months ago

And we breathe in these emissions every fucking day. But the world wants to sell its shitty oil somewhere, so we are the dumping ground. Planned legislation… suck my balls. Parliament moves pretty quickly when they know it makes lots of money for their mates or clamps down on our freedoms. They’ve had years to sort this out, yet Australia remains one of the weakest emissions standards countries in the world.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

On a positive note, the cars we're buying are already manufactured to meet everyone else's emission standards. It's not cost effective otherwise.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

There are very different emissions standards in different places though - adopting a stricter standard that's in widespread use elsewhere results in a sharp cut in both local air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

[–] iraq_lobster@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

in othet words, nothing will changes until politicians finish filling their pockets with dinosaure industry handouts