this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
161 points (96.5% liked)

Hacker News

4123 readers
3 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Anything but fair compensation.

[–] GenEcon@lemm.ee 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

“Spotify already pays nearly 70% of every dollar it generates from music to the record labels and publishers that own the rights for music, and represent and pay artists and songwriters," it continues.

The problem isn't the streaming platforms (unless you want to pay more for your streaming service), but the record labels. Spotify never made profit.

[–] MiltownClowns@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Music used to be more valuable because it was more scarce and more difficult to deliver. Now anybody can make a song and put it on the internet. The value has gone down and artists/labels need to recognize that or people aren't gonna pay them at all.

[–] Pasta4u@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

“Spotify already pays nearly 70% of every dollar it generates from music to the record labels and publishers that own the rights for music, and represent and pay artists and songwriters," it continues.>

I dunno, ifnthat is true it seems more than fair compensation.

[–] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fair compensation for who? Record labels who already rake in tons of money, or small artists that now need 1000 streams a year at minimum to get paid at all on a specific track?

[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I've been making and distributing my own music for over 3 years, not only on Spotify, and JUST hit a total $26 I've made.

[–] GenEcon@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

With increasing the necessary streams to 1000 it will get better, since AI mass produced music won't get any share anymore.

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What kind of music? And would you be willing to share, maybe DM it if you’re more comfortable

[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Mostly electronic music with no words. This is my most recent track: Midnight Funk Train by Thassodar on #SoundCloud https://on.soundcloud.com/DLhDp

I have an album I put out at the beginning of September that's on all streaming services (Spotify link):

Leveling Up

www.linktr.ee/thassodar has links to everything else!

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Maybe try k-pop?

[–] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

I've had music on Spotify almost a decade now. Best it's done was pay to keep it on Spotify. It won't even be able to do that anymore.

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

You do know why bands and artists sell merch at venues, right?

The contracts they’ve signed may entitle them to little or nothing of ticket sales.

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The amazing thing about legislations like this is when eventually the lawmakers backtrack, they lay out red carpet to bring back business, making the situation even worse for the people.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

All that matters is what it looks like on paper. The paper they segment and define themselves.