this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
74 points (98.7% liked)

Gaming

19967 readers
59 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is from earlier this month. But it didn't really hit until seeing more Suicide Squad details.

"Our focus," he continued, "is on transforming our biggest franchises from largely console and PC based with three-four year release schedules to include more always on gameplay through live services, multiplatform and free-to-play extensions, with the goal to have more players spending more time on more platforms."

https://www.eurogamer.net/warner-bros-says-it-plans-to-transform-its-biggest-franchises-into-live-service-games

Gotham Knights is a example. Get ready to see Game of Thrones, Harry Potter, Batman, and Mortal Kombat all get that "live services" treatment.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There must be more profit than last year.

We're witnessing gaming devour itself from the inside in pursuit of this impossible goal.

Buy indie

[–] nonearther@lemmy.ml 21 points 11 months ago

I see.

After ruining their streaming and movies, they are focusing on their gaming division.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

Corpos gonna corp. Here's to the death of their kind

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Another publisher to mark as ignored on steam

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I didn't know you could do this to entire publishers. TIL.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

They'll change their tune when Suicide Squad is a colossal flop. These execs don't understand that it's really hard to do a good live service game.

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 7 points 11 months ago

They have yet to learn their lesson.

[–] Kuro@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Guess I'll continue not playing any of their games

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

I could see it working for a fighting game but it feels like they've whiffed them recently. Wasn't Multiversus supposed to be a pretty big game? I remember it lasting a few weeks of hype and then going into hibernation, something about an early access release and then a season 2? I don't remember honestly.

Mortal Kombat easily fits into live service bullshit, sadly, with all the skins and cosmetics that could be applied to battlepasses instead of cosmetic stores.

All the great WB games in the past have never had this kind of monetization. All the Arkham games, Harry Potter; it's kind of sad seeing them take this approach in the future but it's just a cash cow even with a few whales.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Harry Potter was great as is... No need to change it.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Game of Thrones

Wait there are game of thrones games which aren't shitty mobiles or reskins of unrelated games?

[–] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Telltale did a series years ago. Plus there was an RPG on the 360/PS3 gen too.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml -2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, i meant more like the new ones since OP context seems to suggest future ones.

AGoT have really bad luck for games, that old RPG was decent RPG (but bad as specifically AGoT game) and the best AGoT games are mods for Crusader Kings 2/3.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What is "always on" in a gaming context? I can't imagine wanting a game that you can't close.

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Constant connection to servers required to play, even if the entire game is being run locally.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Oh, that's terrible.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

It means you must always be connected to the internet as a form of DRM.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Isn't MK already pretty live-servicey?

[–] AsterixTheGoth@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Ok.

Who cares? This shit was tired decades ago.

Committee design is what it's always known to be. It has a name. Everybody here who has the basics of understanding knows what it is.