this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
59 points (96.8% liked)

Archaeology

2211 readers
13 users here now

Welcome to c/Archaeology @ Mander.xyz!

Shovelbums welcome. ๐Ÿ—ฟ

Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.

About

Archaeology or archeology[a] is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes.

Archaeology has various goals, which range from understanding culture history to reconstructing past lifeways to documenting and explaining changes in human societies through time.

The discipline involves surveying, excavation, and eventually analysis of data collected, to learn more about the past. In broad scope, archaeology relies on cross-disciplinary research. Read more...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. No pseudoscience/pseudoarchaeology.

Links

Archaeology 101:

Get Involved:

University and Field Work:

Jobs and Career:

Professional Organisations:

FOSS Tools:

Datasets:

Fun:

Other Resources:

Similar Communities

Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

Find us on Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
fossilesque@mander.xyz
recreationalplacebos@midwest.social
SciBot@mander.xyz
FlyingSquid@mander.xyz
59
'No scientific evidence' that ancient human relative buried dead and carved art as portrayed in Netflix documentary, researchers argue (www.livescience.com)
submitted 1 year ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/archaeology@mander.xyz
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

There's "no convincing scientific evidence" behind the extraordinary claims that the ancient human relative Homo naledi deliberately buried their dead and engraved rocks deep in a South African cave around 300,000 years ago, a group of archaeologists argues in a new commentary.

H. naledi became a lightning rod of controversy earlier this year after a team claimed the extinct hominin with an orange-size brain carried its dead into the Rising Star cave system, lit fires and engraved abstract patterns and shapes onto the walls โ€” complex behaviors previously known only in larger-brained modern humans (Homo sapiens) and our close cousins.

The team courted backlash, in part, because they announced their controversial findings in a conference speech and three preprint studies that weren't peer-reviewed, which frustrated some scientists, National Geographic reported at the time. The online journal eLife accepted the preprints, initially posted to bioRxiv in June, for a public peer-review assessment, which concluded that there was "incomplete" evidence behind the claims.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Rizoid@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

This shouldn't surprise anyone considering they gave Grahan Hancock a whole fuckin series of bullshit. Netflix's "documentaries" have been jokes for a few years now.

[โ€“] vxx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I cancelled my subscription a couple years ago because of the bad state of documentaries. I'm not surprised to read this.