this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
393 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I looked it up, it's around 50 000 liters.

[–] kboy101222@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

So about 25,000 peoples minimum drinking water per day per bouy. Not too bad there.

Or the overall average water usage of ~13.2 people (went with the first number cause I ain't researching things rn)

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an engineer and lover of invention, I find the words “wave-powered desalinization” to be damn-near sexually arousing in their elegance and promise.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Slaps ocean; this baby practically desalinates itself!

[–] kbal@fedia.io 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anyone have a better source of info about this? I've found "good news" in the names of things to be a reliable indicator of people who seem to believe they're trying to make the world better while polluting the information environment as much as any other fake news site. I'd rate the article as slightly less credible than a press release from the company itself.

[–] rwhitisissle@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

The thing is that you probably won't find anything that looks too closely at the efficacy of the claims, because the claims are all that anything is reporting on, since the product is so new. Here is a similar article published on asme.org (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), that discusses the buoys and the company's claims surrounding them: https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/tapping-the-ocean

[–] palitu@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago

That is a really cool idea. We often think of renewable energy as electricity. But this bypasses that.

I hope it catches on, and is affordable.

[–] IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Thanks to the power of capitalism, we can be assured that this technological breakthrough will never be put into practice

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

fishes better like a much saltier ocean

[–] rkw_social@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Assuming:
Current ocean salinity = 35 kg / m3. Current ocean volume = 1.4 * 1018 m3. Current human fresh water usage = 4 * 109 m**3.

(35 * 1.4 * 1018) / (1.4 * 1018 - 4 * 10**9).

= 35.0000001 kg / m**3. = New ocean salinity.

I think they'll be okay.

[–] rkw_social@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Apologies double didn't realize the double asterisks would screw up the formatting. 1.4 trillion trillion cubic meters ocean volume. 4 trillion cubic meters fresh water consumption