this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
109 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22049 readers
36 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 55 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Renaming the place you've colonized is a standard settler-colonialist step in the erasure of the indigenous population. Just China being China.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Beehaw once again back with the shit takes

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 45 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Guess I must be the Tiananmen Guy, because I seem to bring all the Tankies to the yard.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Bringing up Tiananmen when there are documented instances (with actual evidence) of people getting run over by Israeli tanks and bulldozers in Gaza right now. Backed by the US government. With the US President actively spreading FUD about the scale and extent of atrocities. Nice.

Xizang is literally the phonetic transliteration for the region of the TAR. You're basically saying that we should keep the name Western colonialists gave a territory because Western brains would get hurt if the name changed.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 34 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I love how you Tankies just assume everyone but you is pro-US or something.

Yeah, absolutely; the Chinese government is evil just like Israel and the US's governments. Glad we agree that they're all imperialist genociders! Good talk!

[–] LicenseToChill@lemdro.id 7 points 11 months ago

For these people it's the most grievous offense to criticize china and russia, and if you're not constantly cheering for total annihilation of the West, you're an ontologically evil libshit and deserve to be gulag'd

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

By the widely recognized origin of the word (the Soviet Union rolling in tanks to suppress revolution in Hungary) and what it means (people in support of that use of force and tanks to suppress civilian revolution), supporters of Israel and the US are both "tankies." Glad we agree, good talk!

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wow, it's absolutely hilarious that you're trying to reclaim that term. Good luck! xD

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Tankie refers to those people who supported the Soviet use of tanks to quell the Hungarian revolution. Literally, it's the exact same thing Israel is doing in Gaza.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Not quite what it refers to now, but I'm sure you'll inform us that you know better.

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to communists who express support for one-party communist regimes that are associated with Marxism–Leninism, whether contemporary or historical.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The term "tankie" was originally used by dissident Marxist–Leninists to describe members of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) who followed the party line of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). Specifically, it was used to distinguish party members who spoke out in defense of the Soviet use of tanks to crush the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the 1968 Prague Spring uprising.

This is why people don't cite Wikipedia.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that is the origin of the term, but it is not what it means now. Is that too complex for you?

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

By the widely recognized origin of the word (the Soviet Union rolling in tanks to suppress revolution in Hungary) and what it means (people in support of that use of force and tanks to suppress civilian revolution), supporters of Israel and the US are both "tankies." Glad we agree, good talk!

Let me be a bit more clear:

By the widely recognized origin of the word

Edit: maybe I wasn't clear enough

widely recognized origin

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah, I see your confusion.

what it means (people in support of that use of force and tanks to suppress civilian revolution)

This ^ is the incorrect part of your statement. That is not what it means now.

edit: Also

Tankie refers to those people who supported the Soviet use of tanks to quell the Hungarian revolution.

Emphasis added. If you meant "referred" in the past tense, that was a typo on your part. Otherwise, you are just trying to reclaim the term to an earlier meaning.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

supporters of Israel and the US are both "tankies." Glad we agree, good talk!

Based af, the tankies who support Chinese and Russian imperialism are equivalent to the tankies who support US and Israeli imperialism.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

For what it's worth, there's still no evidence that Chinese tanks actually killed anyone on 6/4. No journalists on the ground found any indication of a mass casualty event on Tiananmen Square, which directly contradicts the claims made by protestors that there was. The same cannot be said for Soviet tanks in Hungary or Israeli tanks in Gaza, where civilian causalities are rather well-documented.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

What's saddest about this is that it took me literally 3 minutes to find images of tanks in Tiananmen running over student barricades, and blood streaks left on the ground afterwards, and bodies on the ground, but you don't actually care at all, you'll just cover your ears and push your narrative. You're no better than people downplaying what Israel and America do, but you are so wrapped up in the righteousness of your ML rhetoric that you'll just deny it and make up excuses for your side doing the same stuff.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

took me literally 3 minutes to find images of tanks in Tiananmen running over student barricades, and blood streaks left on the ground afterwards

I'm not as fast browsing through the 2141 images you've linked, most of them of protesters, some burned down tanks, and someone on a bike dressed as a tank. Could you point to the exact images you're referring to?

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Have you seen the blood streaks that tank tracks create? You can look at some of the videos in Gaza if you want to.

Try again, maybe this time with actual evidence instead of unfounded conjecture.

Edit: To clarify, I don't think anybody is denying that people were hurt and killed on 6/4. Let's make that clear. If anything, the Tank Man video shows that tank drivers were under orders to avoid civilian casualties.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Thank you for demonstrating my point.

It's very funny to me that you keep bringing up Gaza like it's some counterpoint to what I'm saying, when all you're doing is pointing out another bloodthirsty regime's crimes. Do you think that Israel's government being evil is somehow a rebuttal to China's government being evil?

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You haven't provided any actual evidence.

Is your point that your opinion is built on vibes?

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, no evidence of anything, just images of the massacre. But those could really depict anything!

lmao

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

You're claiming there's a blood smear from a tank running over a body.

Have you seen a tank before? Do you think a tank is just a single block of metal?

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago

No journalists on the ground found any indication of a mass casualty event on Tiananmen Square

ON Tiananmen Square. This is fascist-level wordplay. The same journalists found a massacre all around Tiananmen Square in the rest of Beijing.

no evidence that Chinese tanks actually killed anyone on 6/4

This is just a straight up lie. Lots of people were killed in Beijing. Just possibly not any within the tiny physical confines of Tiananmen Square itself.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@zerfuffle

Yes, I fully understand what you say. You mean this, but honestly, does it add any value?

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Dude brought up a completely unrelated topic and used the "tankie" perjorative, a term that literally describes IDF supporters based on the actions of the IDF in Gaza.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Could you refrain from generalizing and name calling? Your top comment was informative, you could leave it at that.

[–] Devi@beehaw.org 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The government of China are not good people... is that controversial?

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 19 points 11 months ago

Tankies hate this one simple truth...

[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

More like CCP is a bunch of goons and criminals - starting with MF Mao, all the way up to Winnie the Xi virus poo.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's remarkable that Tibetan culture has been so tenacious that there's anything left of it today. If the government of 50 years ago had been able to exert the kind of control over its people that they do today, it's hard to imagine that it wouldn't have been fully eradicated by now.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

We're talking about the same Tibet where, throughout history, almost every single major government position has been held by a Tibetan, right?

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Tibet is the romanized name for the region (based on Latin Tibetum). Tibetans call the Tibetan plateau "Bö" and Central Tibet "Ü-Tsang."

The original Tibetan Empire (circa 600-800 or something) stretched across the regions of Amdo (modern-day Qinghai), Ü-Tsang (modern-day Tibet Autonomous Region), and Khan (split between TAR and Sichuan). Xizang is a more or less direct transliteration of Ü-Tsang, the territory that makes up the vast majority of the modern-day TAR.

Tibet refers to the entire plateau (also referred to as the Qinghai-Xizang plateau or the Himalayan Plateau) and Xizang refers to the territory made up by the TAR. Xizang has, for as long as I can remember, been the Chinese name for the TAR.

This is manufactured outrage with a clickbait title... About what can be expected from Newsweek.

Edit: for some additional context, China is usually pretty good about keeping local names. See: Ürümqi (Wulumuqi) from the name of Dzungar village there, Kashgar (Kashigaer/Kashi) which has had the same name for millennia and Harbin (Haerbin) from the name of the Manchu village there (among others). Understandably, because Hui and Uyghurs still live in Urumqi and Kashgar, Manchu still live in Harbin, and Tibetans still live in Xizang.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@zerfuffle

It really helps if you read the article before posting.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Xizang is as much a "Chinese word" as Tsawwassen or Denali is an "English word." It's literally a direct phonetic transliteration of the Tibetan name used to describe the land occupied by the TAR.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And it's being used to try to distance themselves from the long standing international opposition to their illegal occupation and annexation of Tibet, and the genocide done to achieve it.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe Westerners shouldn't get their panties in a twist about someone not using a name created by the West because Western colonialists couldn't figure out a better transliteration?

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Okay, let's use the name that the legitimate government of Tibet, the Central Tibetan Administration, endorses.

Oh look, it's "Tibet".

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The legitimate government of Tibet... According to who? Even the British (who had just finished shipping opium to China, looting Chinese palaces, and had every reason to antagonize the Chinese) didn't recognize the independence of Tibet.

Regardless, this is the same Tibetan government that supported a caste system and ethnic discrimination, right? That Tibetan government? The same one whose leader has been called out by American media for being a pedophile?

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

According to who?

According to Tibetans.

Regardless, this is the same Tibetan government that...

Yawn. Nothing but whataboutism from you, huh? "Who cares if China did multiple genocides and illegal annexations and disappears people who protest the government, the Tibetan government is also bad, so China should be allowed to ethnic cleanse them!"

No government is good, but other humans being bad isn't an excuse to go and be bad as well. And let's not pretend that China gives a crap about anything except expansion of their resources and influence. You're not impressing anyone by defending a genocidal regime, it just comes off as being incapable of actually critically assessing your own side. You're no different than the MAGA crowd who think America can do no wrong.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The same 6 million Tibetans living in Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Sichuan, and Yunnan? Those Tibetans? The same Tibetans who are the ethnic majority in TAR and make up a significant proportion of the population of Qinghai?

Oh, you meant the Central Tibetan Administration, which nets about 100 people a year leaving China. The same one that's seeing people return to China because the economic prospects elsewhere are worse.

Edit: the TAR, which is governed by Losang Jamcan as Congress Chairman, Yan Jinhai as Government Chairman, and Pagbalha Geleg Namgyai as CPPCC Chairman... All Tibetan. The Tibetan deputies to the National People's Congress... Also Tibetan. Life expectancy increased from 36yo to 72yo. GDP/capita and disposable income/capita growing rapidly YoY. Billions of dollars in infrastructure investment, including the Lhasa HSR. Interesting strategy for a genocide, that's for sure.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is No War in Ba Sing Se!

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago
[–] gyrfalcon@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago

Hey y'all! This thread has sparked a lot of discussion and it is obviously a very tense topic being discussed at a tense time in the world. With the way the thread has been going, the mod team doesn't feel we can moderate this thread thoroughly enough to make it follow our rules, so I am going to lock it.