this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
299 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3900 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 158 points 1 year ago (56 children)

One guy wants to work on Civil rights, taxes, and social services.

The other guy wants to jail anyone who said mean things about him, suspend the constitution, and immediately apon being sworn in use the military to institute the insurrection act and declare martial law.

Centralists: BuT bOtH sIdEs!!!

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As someone who was centrist: you can't be centrist when one person is motivated by spite to tear it down. You aren't a centrist anymore. You're an accessory.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

“Literally can’t tell them apart.”

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago

also everyone on Hexbear.net

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I generally give Republicans more benefit of the doubt than most. I consider myself a liberal libertarian with an open mind to all things. I think there were plenty of valid reasons to vote for Trump the first time around, reasons that much of the country chose to ignore because it was easier than addressing them.

If the GOP nominates Trump again, they deserve to lose as hardcore as possible. I didn't scream and cry when he was elected because I was willing to give him a chance and an open mind. But I think his first term said everything that needed to be said about his suitability as a leader. He talked a big talk of draining the swamp, but then filled his cabinet with alligators and no swamps were drained. If anything, swamps were created as he filled key positions with corrupt people who were loyal to him but had little experience or skill for the job at hand.

Love his policies or hate them, that's just corrupt bad government. And while I don't always agree with Biden's policies, much like Obama, he at least executes the duties of his office in a relatively competent manner.

Same thing if DeSantis gets the nomination. You can't run a platform of jobs creation when you pick a hissy fit with your state's largest employer because they dare voice some mild opposition to a policy of yours (especially when said opposition is essential for said company to maintain credibility on the national level). That speaks volumes about the kind of person, and the kind of leader, that you are. I would rather have someone who's policies I sometimes disagree with, then a childishly vindictive psychophant sitting in the big chair.

Sadly, this all is the very predictable result of the Karl Rove strategy- whip up social conservatives and evangelicals to drum up votes. The result is those groups now have significant power within the GOP, even though their platform of intolerant policies is unappealing to the broader nation to the point of making them unelectable in the eyes of many.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I think there were plenty of valid reasons to vote for Trump the first time around

If you knew anything about Trump you would not have thought this.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
[–] Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago (30 children)

His SAVE program for Student Loans is fucking incredible. It dropped a crippling payment down to $32 a month. He may be old, but that has really helped me. I support him completely.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but why couldn't have Biden done that already!?!?!?! Guess I gotta vote 3rd party now to show how strong my moral character is so I can pat myself on the back as the world burns fake tan orange around me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] febra@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Dangling the carrot of civil rights in front of minorities just so he can get reelected.. it's sad, but it is what it is.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's almost like shit has to go through Congress to become a law.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

If people VOTE it very well may happen. Biden has surprised a whole lot of people so far. Look at the student loan forgiveness - it is happening IN SPITE of the Republicans.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's not like the other guy is going to be better for their civil rights. I'd rather have the guy who doesn't keep his promises over the guy who wants me shot in the street for existing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dangling a carrot of civil rights vs. Dangling a carrot of internment camps. Which one gets the horse moving toward progress?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] graymess@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Pro-tip for more votes: Say "cease fire"

[–] atyaz@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I see this as proof that we don't really live in a democracy. Most people are anti-genocide but a politician asking for a ceasefire is a fringe position. Most people want a higher minimum wage, but it's considered a fringe position in Washington. Most people want universal healthcare, but it's considered a fringe position.

Biden clearly doesn't give a shit about winning the next election.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Obama and Biden chained the Green Party candidate to chair for simply wanting to debate with the other two parties

Biden made cannabis a campaign promise and he walked back right at the start of his presidency

Harris laughed about having consumed cannabis in college while discussing her cannabis arrests

if Trump vs Biden is all we got left we are truly fucked

[–] HerrLewakaas@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Newsflash: you're fucked

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I know which one of the two is much closer to your priorities than the other...

[–] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude needs to promise to legalize weed at the federal level to make up for his past bullshit. That would probably get folks out to vote. Imma vote for the old geezer anyway because I don't want to live though Trump being president again. If Trump gets office again, he'll likely never leave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kromem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Given his age, we should really be hearing what Harris wants to do with her presidency if he wins as well.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

If she's good enough for a Biden she's good enough for me.

Have you seen the other guy? He's talking about instituting martial law on day one, posting armed guards at election sites, purging the federal government, and eradicating political opponents.

The dude already trying to steal a four-year term as president even though he knew he lost the election. If he's elected, he will 100% make himself a dictator for life.

IMO, he has inspired more terrorism in the United States than Osama Bin Laden ever did.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, I have seen the other guy.

Which is why I'm quite concerned that an octogenarian with an unpopular VP who floundered during the primary race and has barely been seen since may not be making it to election day 2024 and passing the torch prematurely at the 11th hour during the most important election cycle in US history.

Biden is acting like a teenager that thinks they are immortal and risking the entire country on that presumption.

We should really be having a primary to run the most capable Dem candidates against Trump. But short of that, they should at very least be adequately preparing for a possible Harris v Trump ticket and not keep pretending she doesn't exist until she's unexpectedly thrust into the spotlight again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I agree with your "Have you seen the other guy?", I can also disagree with Harris.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Same could be said of Trump and his candidate for vice president.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›