this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

PC Master Race

14895 readers
338 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nigh all media is 16:9. What's this obsession people have with 16:10? Isn't it inconvenient to have black bars along your videos and pictures?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slapmefive@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The benefit of taller screens is for productivity, not media consumption. More lines of text is preferable to many people, myself included.

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even non-productivity too! I'm a gamer and I find games to be more "fuller" in 16:10, if that makes sense. I mostly play RTSes and A/RPGs, and recently switched from a 32:9 ultrawide to a 16:10 and I find it better, at least for the games I play.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I could not switch back from 21:9 now. If anything opens in 16:9 I get upset.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I would prefer 2x 21:9 over 3x 16:9
With proper use of window snapping it is superior for research.
But for general productivity I see personally no real upside between 16:9 vs 16:10. Our office administration recently complained it's too constricting so....Some are fans.

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

pictures

Actually, most pictures are 3:2 (DSLR/full-frame camera sensors) or 4:3 (micro four-thirds and smartphone cameras). There are almost no 16:9 sensors out there, so 16:9 pictures are relatively rare, so if you come across a 16:9 picture, it's likely been cropped or stitched together.

[–] kjetil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flashback to ~2008-2009 when all laptops went from 16:10 to 16:9 and we couldn't understand why. 16:9 was for TVs and watching movies. 16:10 was for computers to do work.

While it's true finding 16:9 desktop backgrounds is easier, and watching movies and TVs without black bars is nice, 16:10 is much nice when actually using a computer to do work. Taskbars, toolbars, tabbars, headersbars etc take up a lot of precious vertical space, leaving less space for application content.

[–] nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sidebars are the hot new thing. Latest Microsoft apps are all starting to enable them by default

[–] kjetil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well that's progress. And yet they removed vertical task manager from Windows 11 😢

My windows laptop is sticking with windows 10 as long as I can, hopefully vertical taskbar is back by the time I'm forced to upgrade. Maybe by then it's windows 12, continuing the tick-tock release cycle of good and bad Windowses 😂

Also, shoutout to Firefox addon TreeStyleTabs for having vertical tab management