this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Red Devils

921 readers
5 users here now

All things Manchester United.

New to the community? Come say hi in the Welcome thread.

Got any suggestions on how we can improve and grow as a community? Let us know!

Basic rules:

  1. Fuck the Glazers
  2. Be civil to each other
  3. No non-Manchester United/football content. Non-United content is allowed if it affects United in some way. Otherwise, use the Daily Discussion Thread
  4. Fuck the Glazers
  5. Before posting news, please refer to the Journalist Reliability Guide
  6. Keep it legal - no streams please :)
  7. Have fun!
  8. Fuck the Glazers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
__lemmywinks_bot@lemmy.world
Globulart@lemmy.world
kameecoding@lemmy.world
IbnLemmy@feddit.uk
8
[Simon Stone] Man Utd: Sir Jim Ratcliffe's minority stake close to being agreed (www.bbc.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Motecuhzoma@lemmy.world to c/reddevils@lemmy.world
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wesley@yall.theatl.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'll be interesting to see if we get any immediate changes like sacking Murtough or Arnold.

Arnold is probably safer imo

[–] Motecuhzoma@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, my guess is as long as long as the club’s operations more or less make sense (from a financial perspective) Arnold would be left in place for now. Jim/INEOS would probably want to focus more on the sporting side, meaning Murtough would be on thin ice

[–] wesley@yall.theatl.social 4 points 1 year ago

Especially since Arnold is hands off from the sporting side he probably wouldn't even be under the purview of Ratcliffe is my guess.