this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Woodworking

6140 readers
1 users here now

A handmade home for woodworkers and admirers of woodworkers. Our community icon is a planter box made by @Captain Aggravated, the winner of our summer '24 woodworking contest. Congratulations!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Our roof has these wooden support beams which are a pretty rough cut wood, I was wondering which electrical sanding tool would be the best for something like this, an orbital sander, belt sander...? Thanks!

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you have several tools on hand, just try each of them out on it and see which you like best. Don't overthink it.

Aside from that, in general a belt sander tends to be a more agressive tool than an orbital sander. You might use the former first, then switch to the latter for the final smoothing.

[–] Heliumfart@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would use a seven inch disc on a large angle grinder. It's super aggressive, def will be the fastest. A bit hard to control, and easy to have it dig in, so practice where you can't see it. Your arms will feel the burn after.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unless they are going for a distressed finished look, this is a horrible idea. Even with experience there is no way you'll get a flat finish; without experience you'll have deep pockets and very uneven, rounded corners. Maybe slightly faster than a belt sander, but it'd be negligible and definitely not after all the finish sanding that will be required after.

[–] Heliumfart@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've done several timber frames and refinished a dovetail log home with an angle grinder. You can achieve a flat finish with care, and the time difference over a belt sander is far from negligible. But it is perhaps a bit tricky for a beginner.

[–] sinnerdotbin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I hear ya. The inferred beginner part was more what I was getting at.