this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
297 points (96.6% liked)

News

23259 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Eighty national public health groups, including the American Heart Association, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Preventative Medicine, placed a full-page ad in Sunday’s edition of the Washington Post in support of a federal ban on menthol in cigarettes and all flavored cigars.

“The answer is clear,” the full-page ad says. “Saving lives starts by ending the sale of menthol cigarettes and all flavored cigars.

“Smoking kills nearly half a million people in the United States each year, and these addictive, deadly products are a big part of the problem. The FDA and White House have our full support to release lifesaving rules prohibiting menthol cigarettes and all flavored cigars.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombieTheZombieCat@lemm.ee 64 points 1 year ago (12 children)

When are we going to start banning flavored alcohol like White Claw and Mike's while we're at it

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There ain't to laws when you cracking claws.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I have maybe a cigar a month. Sometimes, a nice dipped cigar is enjoyable. It’d be a shame to just outright ban them.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago

I sort of feel like this is the equivalent of banning white claws or even everything other than IPAs. During the summer I have a cigar most days. Once the temps drop below 60, I'm done with tobacco for six months or so. I don't smoke flavored cigars, but I don't like it for those who do.

[–] stella@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the 'all drugs are bad unless I do them' mentality.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, it's unfortunate. I understand it. The flavours do make smoking more enticing to young people, who might not limit themselves to one cigar a month like you do. But it does suck to ban something outright just because some people will misuse it. Mind you, nicotine is addictive, which is a pretty critical facet to this (though I don't think anyone starts smoking without knowing this risk).

I dislike smoking in general and do want things that are good for society as a whole. But the logic of banning stuff like this seems similar to, say, banning fast food because some people will overeat (or more extreme, having calorie rationing so that people can't overeat on any kind of food). It's admittedly always a balancing act for how much danger is acceptable before we just ban it for everyone. Some bans using this logic are very reasonable, some aren't, and many are extremely debatable.

I think I currently prefer the sin tax approach, especially since that best accomodates occasional usage. A hefty tax makes the dangerous thing less accessible to impressionable young people and helps pay for the social cost (though IIRC, smokers actually cost society less because they die younger, reducing the many medical costs of old age). Price influences people's choices, too. If healthy food is cheaper than unhealthy food, that encourages buying healthy stuff. But even sin taxes are imperfect, especially in a vacuum. They can make the cost of living higher for a vulnerable population. They need to be planned carefully.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Urgh, when they banned them in my country it was with this same stupid logic.

Now I don't smoke (quit 15ish years ago) but this idea that anything flavoured somehow MUST be for the purpose of marketing towards children is insane. It manages to be wrong in two opposite ways:

One: This implies that anything with flavor is not for adults and everyone over the age of majority goes home to enjoy our grey flavourless mush.

Two: This implies that the flavors involved must be what appeals most to children. You know those menthol and whisky tipped smokes that all the children go nuts for.

This logic falls apart (both ways) when you look at any other legal market like booze, weed or vape.

It is almost as if after the US lost the war on drugs they want to try again on a smaller scale.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zippit@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This is hypocrisy. Let people smoke whatever they want. We're not living in the fifties, everybody and their mother knows nicotine kills.

What they don't get is that not everybody has a wonderful life and wants to live forever.

There are bans in place for kids, and adults should have the right to decide what they want. Ban flavoured alcohol too then.

[–] rishado@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Ironically nicotine doesn't kill, bud. Smoking does. I get what you mean but there's no downside to nicotine other than addiction strictly speaking

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

You know, I don't really care what you smoke, but I care that it's communal. Somebody drinking wine, beer, a white claw, etc a few feet away doesn't immediately negatively impact my existence by depriving me of clean air ... or cause a friend with breathing issues a panic attack.

Plenty of adults "decide" to smoke for kids by smoking with the kids around.

Plenty of adults "decide" to smoke in the entrances of buildings, on busy sidewalks, in an outdoor mall, etc.

Plenty of adults have "decided" to smoke because it's "safe" per some anecdote that they heard about a family member that smoked 3 packs a day and lived to be 90.

It's actually all pretty freaking infuriating. One of the best things that's ever been done is banning smoking inside of most buildings.

At the very least the age should be raised to match alcohol.

[–] stella@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We see fewer and fewer of the adults you mention with each passing day.

I recall as a child seeing adults smoking all the time. Now it's a rare occurrence.

At the very least the age should be raised to match alcohol.

Jesus fucking christ, you people...

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So the takeaway is that the health warnings are right?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the very least the age should be raised to match alcohol.

FYI it has been, on a Federal level (in the US), since 2019. Donald Trump of all people on Earth signed that into law. The legal age to buy cigarettes and to buy alcohol in the US is the same, 21.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People who think smokers smoke for the flavor are not in touch with reality. This will do nothing for public health.

[–] rchive@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it will. It will drive menthols underground and they'll become more dangerous just like alcohol during Prohibition.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You can just buy menthol infusers online. This law will do nothing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like every time this comes up, this is straight up racism.

If they actually cared about protecting children, they'd put quality control restrictions on the fluids used in vape pens to prevent popcorn lung and the like BECAUSE KIDS DON'T REALLY SMOKE CIGARETTES ANYMORE.

You know who disproportionately smokes menthols and flavored cigarellos?

Black people.

If they actually had something against smoking, they'd ban ALL CIGARETTES.

If they were actually trying to protect kids, they'd go after what kids are using.

They're going after the smoke of choice for large portions of the black community.

What does that tell you?

[–] max@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it really, though? My country banned menthols ages ago, because it made cigarettes less nasty and thus easier to get into. Makes sense to me. We don’t have the amount of segregation here like in the US. At least not racially-based. Not saying there isn’t any, but it’s definitely not on the same level.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If we don't stand with smokers and stop the American Heart Association now, then by the time it comes to force us to eat right and exercise, it'll be too late.

[–] EyesInTheBoat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Have you run a marathon this week? No? Your medical insurance rates are 2x until you resolve this problem.

[–] DBT@artemis.camp 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Non-menthol cigs are fine, we just can’t stand for the ones black people prefer.

[–] Thade780@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

The only reason I ever smoked menthol was because of the rumor that they got you higher after smoking.

[–] stella@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Sigh. The only good drugs are the ones I take.

Let's stop policing what people put in their bodies, eh?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can't legislate morality, this isn't going to make people smoke less it will make people grumpy while smoking

[–] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Or you know, we could just regulate and test what goes into these products rather than create another black market for ones that will only inevitably be produced with even less quality overseas and imported

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

What the fuck?

load more comments
view more: next ›