this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Android

17574 readers
185 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't get me wrong. Apple removing audio jack was the biggest facepalm in smartphone history. And you can thank it for not being able to make an upgrade without sacrificing audio jack (and SD card too :/). But USB-C is getting standardized everywhere now (laptops, smartphones, etc.). What makes USB-C earphones not worth the switch?

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because it needs an extra dongle that isn't free and most headphones use an ordinary audio jack.

Charging while listening.

And above all, if it ain't broke don't fix it.

[–] zxo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly, most headphones that I like are wired with an ordinary audio jack. I don't really feel inclined to get new headphones for a new phone, and a phone without an audio jack just makes things more difficult for me.

[–] Zerfallen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You don't need new headphones though, just the usb-c adaptor, which you can leave permanently attached to the cable (if you only use them with your phone/laptop).

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And above all, if it ain't broke don't fix it.

This is actually terrible logic and stifles innovation. The flip phone wasn't broke....but now we have smart phones with screens.

[–] ijeff@lemdro.id -1 points 1 year ago

Just a friendly reminder to folks to keep it civil and to reserve downvotes for things that are inappropriate, not disagreement! πŸ™‚

[–] ezures@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Touchscreen fixes the problem of maximizing the screen on the device. How does removing a jack port fixes the audio problem?

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Condenses the ports to one standard. Instead of an audio and a USB-C, you just have a USB-C. So now you can fit more/different stuff in the internals or streamline the device to make it slightly smaller or thinner. Far enough down the line when most everyone is on board, can remove support for it from the kernel, minimizing the code footprint, attack surface, and code maintenance.

Sure, it sucks now as we're in the midst of it and people are resistant to change, but fast forward to when it's universally adopted and accepted, it'll be better.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But this is almost all false or just speculation.

Instead of having audio and usb-c, now you have usb-c port, usb-c headphone dongle, the finally audio port and usb-c port again. Unless you want to intentionally buy a usb-c exclusive set of headphones that won't work with whatever next "revolutionary port technology" comes out.

As long as they still work, good headphones from 40 years ago are still good. Headphone tech has not significantly changed. Amps, DACs, etc have, but not the actual drivers.

As far as space goes, reasonable DAC components are getting smaller and smaller while phones tend to be getting larger as people want more screen space. The space savings on hardware here is not significant. Seriously go and look up sizes of the components needed for audio out.

As far as thinner goes, the width needed for a headphone jack is like 2mm more than what's needed for a usb-c port, and there's width needed for internal speakers either way. I'm also not sure how much thinner people want cell phones to be at this point. We're pretty close to the point of sacrificing device drop resistance for size anyway (arguably we've passed that point with most people doubling the size of their phone with a protective case). Not to mention that the real thing preventing more thinness is the camera lenses now, as easily evidenced by the camera island bumps all phones have now.

Lastly, you can't seriously be arguing that analog audio out represents any significant amount of attack surface kernel wise. Like holy shit man. Wow. Yes, technically every line of code is increased attack surface, but it's a huge assumption that USB-C audio is in any way more secure or less surface.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Everyone's favourite old headphones not having a USB cable is likely to be the main reason.

  1. I have aux earphones and it needs to work with some extension on new phones.
  2. Earphone while charging
  3. Enabling OTG for usb eaphone
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's just exactly no upsides.

Among other things, a USB-C connector is less stable than a 3.5mm jack, and can twist the cable since the connector cannot spin.

Sure, it can do a lot of things, but there's no reason to break an existing standard if the proposed successor is inherently worse.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was looking for someone to mention the connection itself. To add to that the connector is a lot more delicate since it's some ~~40~~24 pins vs 3 or 4.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Downsides of usb-c headphones:

  1. Bluetooth security risk surface, exposes your phone to more attacks. (Nobody has mentioned this yet)

  2. Most/all phones have a single usb-c port. Charging and using headphones difficult

  3. Usb-c port placement is awkwardly on bottom of phone while must headphone jacks are on top of the phone. Plugging in your headphones on the bottom of the phone with a dongle is awkward.

  4. The entire process of using a usb-c dongle or using Bluetooth headphones makes the entire system more complicated. KISS (keep it simple). The more complexity there is that can go wrong, the worse the experience. If I'm taking a important conference call, I want my audio to just work.

Not directly related: the whole point of removing the headphone jack was to sell airpods. First apple, then android, and even fair phone. Each time the jack is removed to push sales of the branded Bluetooth ear buds. It's a user hostile move.

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/apple-airpods-success

The excuse may be to save money, Space, water rating, but the reason is increased sales.

I personally still use a pixel 5A which had a headphone jack only because it's the B tier phone for markets where people are less likely to also buy the airpods.

[–] Laice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how is using bluetooth headset making it more complicated.....

All other points are valid.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 year ago

Bluetooth complication over a wired headset:

  1. Battery charge levels
  2. Radio interference
  3. Bluetooth time sharing with other devices
  4. Bluetooth devices getting stolen by another device while in use (ever had two phones paired to one headset?)
  5. Bluetooth microphone audio quality levels are not great
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The fact that there is more than one "standard" for USB-C audio is enough to hate it.

Analog 3.5mm just works with everything. No dongles, no drivers, no "unsupported device", no batteries.

It. Just. Works.

[–] macrocarpa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The devices that you describe are incompatible with a standard that has been mature for 50 years.

The 3.5mm jack is everywhere, it is the standard. USB C is incredibly recent.

Put it this way, if you were to walk into a store and pick up any given electronic product with audio output, would you expect it to have an audio jack, or a USB C connector?

In your drawer full of random electric cables, how many have 3.5mm plugs in them vs usb a, micro, mini, or some propriety plug? And how many could you plug into a device and just...work?

So why do you accept devices that don't have this standard?? It is beyond me.

[–] S13Ni@lemmy.studio 1 points 1 year ago

Because all USB C to 3.5mm Aux adapters are flimsy as mother fuckers that break down after two months use. I would not even care otherwise, I never charge and listen at same time anyway.

If anyone has suggestions for adapter that is not made out of thinnest possible wire and is durable, let me know.

Also, I don't want to buy USB-C headphones, since I would only use those with my phone, I want to use them also on other devices, and for compatibility it is better to have it analog instead of USB-C. If I were to buy headphones for phone only, I would just get wireless.

I often have use cases at work where I have to plug in my headphones to device I am not familiar with, for audio troubleshooting at our customers device. Most of the times USB is not an option, only standard analog audio.

Modern laptops also come with way too few USB ports, 2.0 and C combined, so I rather not waste one for audio since there is no reason for audio to go through USB. On my main PC I don't use my internal soundcard but external audio interface for music production, and I want my headphones connected to that, not USB.

So in conclusion, USB-C headphones would be totally worthless to me, no matter the device. Even for phone, I rather go with adapter, or just wireless ones.

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

USB-C is getting standardized everywhere now

3.5 mm has been a standard from the motherfisting 1950s

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't seen a single phone that has more than one USB-C port, and I would like to listen to stuff while these these phones charge their miniscule batteries.

[–] Laatikko@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Asus ROG Phone 5 and newer has two usb-c ports.

LMAO. They got rid of headphone jack to "save space" and then replaced it with bigger USB C connector

[–] Teknikal@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am not an audiophile or anything but for these oems a headphone jack inclusion is probably pennys and wired is just superior sound, it's madness.

That said I use Bluetooth headphones mostly myself but that doesn't change the fact its inferior sound, something extra to charge and can add quite a bit of lag when playing games or other media.

Its a step backwards just to make a few pennys profit on a hundreds of pounds device. I think everyone should have the option to choose what they prefer.

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.film -1 points 1 year ago

USB C dongles have potential to be higher quality than your built in-jack if quality is the main concern

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago

I do it out of principle. I disagreed with their decicion to remove it like so many others at the time but unlike the vast majority of those others I decided to vote with my wallet and to this day I refuse to buy a phone without one.