this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
874 points (90.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9609 readers
443 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(does not reflect my opinion, just thought it looked funny)

Less hostile when in context.

Taken from a YouTube channel called Not Just Bikes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cars are already subject to noise restrictions. So effectively loud cars are banned. There is just little enforcement for most of it.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's refocus the police funds of shooting or falsely arresting POC, and instead ticketing and enforcing the loud car situation.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Who needs cops? I believe CA passed a bill to trial automatic enforcement of this issue last year. Detects excessive noise and photographs the license plates just like speed cameras.

I’m waiting to see where they will trial it. I haven’t heard anything recently.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

I'll say that so much of this is unnecessary or even BS. Ban loud cars because they're annoying, that's all that is necessary. Set a decibel limit and if you exceed it then you can be fined. Set time limits like when most people are sleeping so you can have loud cars at some more reasonable times and ban them when people aren't expecting stupidly loud noises.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Most cities already have noise ordinances. But as usual owning a car gives you situational immunity to the law.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This was the line of thought I had as well, it should be so easy to stop this problem as it stands

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You can't just bust out a sound meter and take a reading. There are so many factors that it makes it unenforceable, because at the end of the day the burden of proof would still be placed on the enforcement arm that it was that vehicle. How do you control for ambient noise? Distance? Temperature? It is just unenforceable to make a dB level a mark.

If your car goes pop pop pop, though, I think you need to have your car taken away, and maybe your freedom, because you're just an asshole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They are not enforced.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Ok well regardless of surrounding habitats; it’s a driving hazard. Loud cars are a hazard on the road if the owner cannot hear those around them. It’s not on the list but it should be front and center when it comes to road safety around others cuz the road is shared.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That doesn't really make a lot of sense either though. Most cars have built in sound proofing and while you can hear other cars, it's rarely a useful sense when driving. If not being able to hear is a significant hazard then why are deaf people allowed to drive?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] query@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fine the manufacturer for each incident with each vehicle and make them recall and fix every one to stop it. Unless it's the result of someone modifying their own vehicle, then you seize the vehicle and suspend their license.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

People modify their vehicles to be loud.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You guys lump motorcycles in on this, right? There's some biker rally/meetup relatively close by this week/weekend, so I'm busy giving the finger to every asshole that passes with their stupid straight-pipe harleys and dumb shitty radios screaming skynard or AC/DC.

I drive an EV, fwiw. There's literally zero public transportation here, so I'm not on the fuckcars train, sorry.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 59 points 1 year ago

Fuckcars is not necessarily about not having a car. It's about wanting the conditions in which you're able to get rid of your car.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

You can have a car and still want to fuck cars... wait no... and still be fuckcars. I do, and I'm mad I need one at all without losing hours a day.

[–] Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

My town has a “bike week” every few months it feels like, where all the people with their way too damn loud bikes get the privilege of blocking off half the city for a week to.. I don’t even know?? Drink, I guess? Whatever the case, a major road becomes impassable and the entire city gets too loud to have a conversation on the sidewalk. It’s awful, god knows why the city thinks it’s a good idea. Ugh, now l’m annoyed again just thinking about it…

[–] query@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'd argue fossil motorcycles should be banned before fossil cars. If it's about riding with nothing between you and the ground, an electric MC will do plenty. Otherwise, cars serve the same need.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

They’ve both gotta go. The order is not important to me as long as it’s soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what about that one dude who wants to go rrrrrRRRRRRRRRRRRR at three in the morning and wake up everyone in a five mile radius?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As someone who lives near a busy road: lets start with making subwoofers illegal first. Its 100x worse than a roaring engine

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

How about both? A car with a subwoofer is still a loud car.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Idk about the US but here you can be fined if you cause noise. Like maxing out the subwoofer on a parking lot next to residential areas, being a nuisance. As much as I agree with you, I still found loud exhaust/engine noise worse, just because there's much more of it.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, there are noise ordinances in theory, but those are never enforced and if you live in a questionable neighborhood, the penalty for calling the cops to enforce them is way steeper than just dealing with the insufferable noise. I hate feeling bass shake my whole house at 2am, but if I have to choose I guess I pick that over being shot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Or just because it's annoying as hell and we have the technology to make silent cars, so there is no valid reason to have noisy cars on public roads.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

How about how some luxury cars are so silent, that speakers or exhaust diaphragms are added to make noise.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

Very similar arguments apply for church bells, too.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As somebody who lives in a questionable neighbor, I would personally sacrifice a lot if we could ban vehicles from playing music above personal listening levels while in residential zones. Feeling house-reverberating bass at all hours of the day is way worse than normal car noises.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

On vehicles modified for sporting purposes the silencers no longer work because the propagation of sound is different and therefore db-killers are applied or it is avoided to drive them around the city center or during off hours. Then there are people who purposely remove the silencer just to make noise and this also reduce factory performance, these deserve to have their license withdrawn because they take advantage of the fact that noisy vehicles occasionally exist.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

In the right column should also have : cannot be aware of others on the road if you can’t hear their regular engines around you.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don’t need loud vehicles for that, you can still hear quiet vehicles today

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] spacesatan@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I moved to an apartment adjacent to an intersection on a medium-high traffic stroad and it was the biggest mistake of my life. I have never been so stressed. I can barely even enjoy music now because half the time if I hear low bass in a song I think its coming from outside and I get annoyed for a few seconds.

And car sound systems.

load more comments
view more: next ›