this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
719 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3572 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ProPublica

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's crazy that he isn't in prison for this level of corruption. Crazier that he is still actively serving on the highest court in the U.S. His corrupt decisions are actively screwing us.

If these are the bribes that can prove, how many more has he taken that we can't?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Just an educated guess… 69 morbillion.

[–] Danc4498@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is any of it actually illegal?

[–] Tigbitties@kbin.social 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've never had 38 vacations in my life and I'm 49yo

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well, pick yourselves up by your bootstraps and become a Supreme Court Justice then! Simple!

[–] rayyyy@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Not that simple. You have to work hard on a reputation as a SCOTUS whore.

[–] Bwaz@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't had half that many and I'm 70.

Honest question for a 70 yo... how did you discover lemmy? Did you migrate with reddit or from the before times?

[–] AlaskaMan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I’ve had five vacations and I’m almost 40. Only three as an adult.

[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In the US, bribery is legal for the ruling class, illegal for everyone else.

Insider trading is legal for the ruling class, illegal for everyone else.

Embezzlement is legal for the ruling class, illegal for everyone else.

It is very hard to not get very wealthy if you are part of the ruling class. Money will just legally flow into your pocket, as long as you're not loyal to the people.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t forget drugs. They do a lot of drugs.

[–] Ubermeisters@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago

C-c-c-yeah!!!

[–] ronalicious@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

if it's just a fine... well, you know the rest :\

[–] BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you really a public servant if you live like royalty?

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unelected... appointed for life... no ethics rules...

Yeah this is some real anti-democratic bullshit.

[–] Hype@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I never understood why we can elect local judges but not our Supreme Court. I understand why people say it's to keep it from being a political position that people run for like the president, but there has to be some harsher regulations on the Supreme Court judges becuase they keep doing shit like this. All the weird shit is to keep them "unbiased" but it's clearly that's just lie we tell the people to keep them placated.

If anyone believes the Supreme Court judges are unaffiliated with political parties, they are willingly ignorant.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's horrific that we've arrived at a place where you can read about any conservative in power being caught red-handed committing any crime, and without even looking, you can be 100% sure that Republicans will ignore or deny the problem.

Zero integrity.

[–] Hype@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As all this stuff comes out and gets verified, I keep naively thinking that we will see these people face consequences soon. Eventually someone will have to take action and remove him from his position, but as time passes, nothing happens. The news cycle moves on, and the general population forgets.

It's shit like this that further drives me into nihilism.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

100 percent agree. I mean, we talk about Trump facing consequences now, but he was entirely spared any charges for the campaign finance fronts that sent his lawyer to jail, and for which Trump was EXPRESSLY named as a co-conspirator! This was due to the decision of a Republican-dominated committee.

INFINITELY WORSE is that Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, declined to press charges or appoint a special counsel to investigate THE MOST EGREGIOUS CASE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN UNITED STATES HISTORY. Mueller outlined all the ways that Trump thwarted the investigation into Russia's interference in our 2016 election on his behalf.

Trump fired the FBI director, and EXPRESSLY said (caught on tape) that AT THE TIME HE FIRED COMEY he was thinking that this would make the Russia investigation go away. To be clear, if you read this in a law school exam, you would know for sure that the professor was giving you a huge clue that mens rea was established (at the TIME of the criminal act, did the defendant intend to commit the crime). I mean, it was handed to us on a silver platter.

Just to be 100 percent clear on what happened: Trump was given a pass for obstructing the investigation into whether or not he committed TREASON by CONSPIRING with a foreign adversary to interfere with our presidential election.

AND DEMOCRATIC APPOINTED Merrick Garland sat on these charges to the point where they can no longer be filed because of the statute of limitations.

It was OUTRAGEOUS that Trump's own AG didn't press charges, but utter insanity that they weren't filed the instant Trump was out of office.

[–] x_ray_rabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's not just about whether these people has cases before the court. It's also about their access to influence and instill a political mindset within the Justices that could sway them to decide one way or the other on any issue.

[–] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope they are doing this for all of the Justices.

[–] Bwaz@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

From Reddit

[–] Bwaz@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

From Reddit