this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19570 readers
3 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lynny@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. The rule is stupid and deserves to be worked around. Water is essential. I hate when I go to these kinds of public places and they give you no option to get water other than bringing it yourself. Poor logistics on the part of the event organizers.

[–] dystop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The official reason for such rules are usually "we need a mix of vendors" or something like that.

The unofficial, true reason is usually that the organizer wants to be the only one selling water so they can sell it for $5.

[–] Kaiser@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I like that we’re allowing images here instead of just text only.

[–] 4am@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is often (but not always!) done at events where either the organizers, or the permitting government, suspects that people may use drugs and want to "discourage" such behavior.

TBH that just makes it more of a human rights violation.

I went to a club in NYC 20-ish years ago and they were selling bottled water for $6 a bottle (in 2001!) The bathrooms only had hot water so no one could refill. It was also quite hot in the main room. Scumbags.

[–] seeCseas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Er... drinking water helps with consuming drugs?