this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Emacs

311 readers
1 users here now

A community for the timeless and infinitely powerful editor. Want to see what Emacs is capable of?!

Get Emacs

Rules

  1. Posts should be emacs related
  2. Be kind please
  3. Yes, we already know: Google results for "emacs" and "vi" link to each other. We good.

Emacs Resources

Emacs Tutorials

Useful Emacs configuration files and distributions

Quick pain-saver tip

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Qudit314159@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

That's what I call an informative title.

[–] agumonkey@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

99% of can emacs do are to be answered by a firm yes, and an additional "it's built-in since 198*"

[–] dargscisyhp@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've always wondered how many emacs questions are related to multithreading, and now I know. 1%

[–] agumonkey@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Icy_Thought@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

100% THIS! There is even a built-in Vi mode (viper-mode) in Emacs!

[–] lmarcantonio@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

evil is the recommended vi emulation these days. You could say emacs has *at least* three vi emulation modes.

[–] oantolin@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bet that folks that prefer vi to Vim would prefer viper to evil.

[–] ragnese@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bet that folks that prefer vi to Vim

Those exist? That's like hipster^2 (I say this as someone who can't even type a damn email without my Vi(m) reflexes kicking in).

[–] oantolin@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I imagine some people prefer vi because they think Vim is "bloatware".

[–] terminal_prognosis@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was so much my experience working with enthusiastic vim fanboys - they kept telling me "look at how awesome vim is, it can now do this!", and I'd say, "er, yes, Emacs has always had that, I've been doing that since 1992".

They literally never came up with something unique to vim, but that never shook in their firm belief that vim was absolutely the best most powerful editor and Emacs was a joke.

[–] agumonkey@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

well vim has always started with minimal core

but when subtext popped, there were some stuff, I forgot what, but a few ergonomics ideas (like projectile, multiple-cursors, maybe nicer fuzzy search) that weren't present in emacs. took a few months for someone to make it happen .. and that was it.

emacs can absorb most ideas, unless it's something that would break the whole architecture

[–] 2tvenom@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Ok_Advisor1053@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, this is how I'd do it.

[–] agumonkey@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

ah good old magnars mc

[–] funk443@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lmao, that vim guy got blown out of the water

[–] a_moody@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah. I love both vim and emacs and it's kinda silly with these comparisons. Also, pretty much anything vim can do, emacs can not only do it, but if you're using evil, you don't even need to use different keys.

[–] SlowValue@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Here is a video showing two more variants:

https://0x0.st/HJF3.mkv

[–] unduly-noted@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

How did you do the number incrementing?