this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
86 points (97.8% liked)

World News

32227 readers
480 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HerrVorragend@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Al Jazeera clearly have their own biases, but outright banning them would be a bad sign.

They seem to be the only news station with reporters on the ground IN Gaza, so a ban could be seen as shutting the last (official) window of information, which does not sound good at all.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Al Jazeera has the shocking bias of valuing the lives of Muslims

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're also owned by the Qatari government so like, don't believe them if they tell you the slaves that make up 89% of Qatar's population are enjoying prosperous and fulfilling lives

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

This reporting isn't on Qatar.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_controversies_and_criticism

Not just Israel and western governments that have accused them of an Islamist bias. The Palestinian Fatah party has also previously accused them of bias towards Hamas. At one point they closed down Al Jazeera's offices in the West Bank.

The English language version is apparently less openly biased than the Arabic version.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

No way, Muslims are biased towards Muslims?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago

Well, as long as they're the right type of Muslim.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Proposed earlier this week by Israeli communications minister Shlomo Karhi, the regulations would allow officials to “halt media broadcasts and confiscate broadcast equipment if an outlet’s output is seen to harm national security, public order, or serve as a basis for ‘enemy propaganda,’” according to the Times of Israel.

“We are deeply concerned by Israeli officials’ threats to censor media coverage of the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict, using vague accusations of harming national morale,” Sherif Mansour, CPJ’s Middle East and North Africa program coordinator, said in a statement.

“Israel’s pattern has been that, in times of war, there’s military censorship,” Jon Alterman, senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told The Washington Post.

In 2008 Israel accused Al Jazeera of being a “tool of Hamas,” the Palestinian militant group that controls the Gaza Strip, and launched a boycott of the station.

At the time, the executive secretary of Israel’s Foreign Press Association, Glenys Sugarman, told Reuters that “changing the law in order to shut down a media organization for political reasons is a slippery slope.”

“[But] during the intifadas, during wartime, there’s a persistent sense that Al Jazeera, as a station, is rooting for Israel’s enemies,” Alterman said.


The original article contains 568 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

When shooting journalists wearing Press vests in the head isn't good enough anymore.