this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
100 points (97.2% liked)

World News

38578 readers
1884 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Russian missile attack killed two civilians in an apartment building in southern Ukraine on Wednesday, local authorities said, as President Vladimir Putin dismissed the importance of a new U.S.-supplied weapon that Kyiv used to execute one of the most damaging attacks on the Kremlin’s air assets since the start of the war.

Putin told reporters that Russia “will be able to repel” further attacks by the U.S.-made Army Tactical Missile System, known as ATACMS.

Ukraine claimed it used those missiles to destroy nine Russian helicopters, as well as ammunition, an air defense system and other assets at two airfields in Russia-occupied regions on Tuesday.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mustbe3to20signs@feddit.de 34 points 11 months ago

Since everything Putin says is a lie, every Ukrainian ally should increase their ammunition exports.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, when your whole war strategy is to use the bodies of your people to soak up all the ammo of your enemy I'm pretty sure anyone supplying ammo to them is going to make a pretty big difference.

[–] Mindlight@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it has been proved that the weapons supplied by the US dismisses the importance of Putin.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm just going to point out that we made this thing in the 90s to fight an enemy we didn't expect this thing to do more than mildly wound.

This wasn't a great wunderwaffen, this was just our version or advanced artillery, and here it is shattering parts of the Russian army at a stroke.

The greatest generation would be so confused.

[–] HamSwagwich@showeq.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The US has spent decades preparing to fight an enemy on equal technological footing, and now that it turns out that enemy never made it past the 1970s technologically or organizationally, the US is basically fighting with lasers against muskets.

China might be able to bring more to the table but that's looking questionable.

Disregarding the nuclear option, I suspect a direct conflict with Russia would, while costly, end up much like the middle east, where the enemy only succeeds with guerilla tactics and throwing bodies at the problem, but can never hope to actually win.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

What's sad is that after the Soviet Union fell... we decided to go ahead and finish the F-22.

That's not even overkill, that's just insulting their mother.

[–] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

So, he's admitting that he's done such a bad job of conquering Ukraine that he'd still be failing even without western assistance?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

My main takeaway here is that the new weapons will soon redraw the front lines of this war and providing them was clever, according to my Putin filter.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

So basically it's US weapons making a huge difference. . always be bullshitting pooty.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Ukraine claimed it used those missiles to destroy nine Russian helicopters, as well as ammunition, an air defense system and other assets at two airfields in Russia-occupied regions on Tuesday.

Putin, speaking to reporters during a visit to Beijing, conceded the ATACMS creates an additional threat but he insisted that the weapon would not change the situation along the 1,500-kilometer (932-mile) front line.

Russia’s ambassador to the U.S., Anatoly Antonov, described Washington’s decision to supply the ATACMS as “reckless” and “a grave mistake” that won’t alter the war’s outcome.

However, the areas are well defended and it is “highly unlikely” the Russians will accomplish their goal of a major breakthrough, it said in an assessment posted on social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.

Wednesday’s attack killed two Ukrainian civilians and wounded at least three others when a Russian missile struck a building in the central district of the southern city of Zaporizhzhia, the region’s Gov.

Russia’s defense ministry, meanwhile, claimed its forces shot down 28 Ukrainian drones in the Belgorod and Kursk regions and in the Black Sea area.


The original article contains 413 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It would be awesome to see Putin giving some sort of address talking about how some weapon doesn't pose a threat and then in the background some military asset gets destroyed during the address.

Assuming he's on the same side of the Urals as Ukraine. Maybe he's playing it safe and is staying in the part of Russia that's in Palin's backyard.