this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
-4 points (16.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7326 readers
123 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LexiconDrexicon@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what you get when you elect 80 year old boomers

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not an age thing, it's a class thing

[–] LexiconDrexicon@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an age thing, old people have always been like this

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plenty of young people are like this too, my point is that transphobia is manufactured by capitalists to divide the proletariat and that's what they're doing right now.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. Here in Finland the under 25's most popular party in the recent parliamentary election was the extremist right wing one, followed by the "fiscal" conservatives (ie. they'd be OK with the extremists setting up concentration camps for leftists and foreigners as long as the camp was operated by a private corporation that didn't have to pay taxes). Granted that we're a pretty conservative country to begin with, but statistically gen X / millennial folks are more liberal than younger people here, and it just keeps getting worse every time there's an election.

[–] LexiconDrexicon@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're talking about 80 year olds, not any of those younger people. Old people are the problem, they should retire, not enter politics

[–] TheMage@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Why should young, inexperienced people run the country? I admit that the US Govt. Is a tad too old, especially the current president. But, that doesn’t mean we need a bunch of Berkeley students running things either. No thanks.

Look, I know, I was once a kid/young adult too and didn’t listen to my parents or senior people very often, went against the grain, etc. but you eventually realize that maybe they DO know more than you did when you were in your 20s or whatever.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The bill isn't anti-lgbt, but it does give way too much power to the attorney general to decide what's harmful for children. That should be covered in the law, if at all.

But the worst part is that it strongly encourages companies to perform age verification, and given how often security breaches happen, that's just not something I'm comfortable with.

If parents want to protect their kids, they should do it themselves. There are Internet filters on the market (which I'm convinced don't work because kids will find a way around them), and the best option is to just... be a part of kids' lives and teach them how to be safe on the Internet. If you don't trust your kids on the Internet, don't give them smartphones or access to a computer.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The bill isn’t anti-lgbt, but it does give way too much power to the attorney general to decide what’s harmful for children. That should be covered in the law, if at all.

In effect it will be, which is the only thing that matters.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, the law itself isn't anti-lgbt, it just enables anti-lgbt people to abuse it.

The opposition shouldn't be that it's anti-lgbt, but that is anti-privacy.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

If it lets people use it to target the lgbtq+ community, and it is obvious that it will be, it is anti-lgbtq+. Things exist within the context they exist in.