this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
188 points (93.1% liked)

Privacy

31934 readers
740 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A programmer in northern China has been ordered to pay more than 1 million yuan to the authorities for using a virtual private network (VPN), in what is thought to be the most severe individual financial penalty ever issued for circumventing China's "great firewall." The programmer, surnamed Ma, was issued with a penalty notice by the public security bureau of Chengde, a city in Hebei province, on August 18. The notice said Ma had used "unauthorised channels" to connect to international networks to work for a Turkish company. The police confiscated the 1.058m yuan ($145,092) Ma had earned as a software developer between September 2019 and November 2022, describing it as "illegal income," as well as fining him 200 yuan ($27).

Charlie Smith (a pseudonym), the co-founder of GreatFire.org, a website that tracks internet censorship in China, said: "Even if this decision is overturned in court, a message has been sent and damage has been done. Is doing business outside of China now subject to penalties?"

Abstract credit: https://slashdot.org/story/420019

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 year ago

The police confiscated the 1.058m yuan ($145,092) Ma had earned as a software developer between September 2019 and November 2022, describing it as "illegal income," as well as fining him 200 yuan ($27).

[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you can't work for a Turkish company from China? Using a VPN is normal for work.

[–] binboupan@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

If your company needs a VPN it needs to be approved by the government first.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Nobsi@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

According to hexbear lemmy.ml and some other idiots: Nothing. This is actually a good thing. And in reality it's the US that is at fault

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Its basicly 1984. They brain wash there population and the government is the supreme authority

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 13 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The programmer, surnamed Ma, was issued with a penalty notice by the public security bureau of Chengde, a city in Hebei province, on 18 August.

Ma said the police seized his phone, laptop and several computer hard drives upon learning that he worked for an overseas company, holding them for a month.

Charlie Smith (a pseudonym), the co-founder of GreatFire.org, a website that tracks internet censorship in China, said: “Even if this decision is overturned in court, a message has been sent and damage has been done.

VPNs, which help users circumvent the “great firewall” of internet censorship by making it look as if their device is in a different country, operate in a legal grey area in China.

The government generally turns a blind eye to the relatively small number of individuals who use the technology to access websites such as Google, Facebook, Twitter and, often, view pornography.

In June, Radio Free Asia reported that a Uyghur student, Mehmut Memtimin, was serving a 13-year sentence in Xinjiang for using a VPN to access “illegal information”.


The original article contains 682 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm often confused about China's laws.

If doing business outside of China is now illegal doesn't that rather undermine the basis of theur whole cheap manufacturing economy?