this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
657 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

8565 readers
2040 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Without spending 8-12+ hours a day staring at a screen, I probably wouldn't have needed glasses.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Far as we know currently, looking/staring at screens does not cause permanent damage to your vision.

Screen time is no worse than book time or sewing time or Wolfenstein time.

Concentrating reduces your blink rate. Reduced blinking dries out your eyes. That's the main detrimental effects.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 12 hours ago

I've been looking at screens for decades and I still have perfect vision

[–] ArrrborDAY@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Bubs12@lemmy.cafe 5 points 12 hours ago

Ya, hard pass on traveling back in time. The past smells like shit.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

Natural selection is how humans developed the capability to invent optometry in the first place

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

Fair, but cavemen in our time keep falling for cults.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

The reason for widespread short-sightedness is unknown but the best study I read showed that kids playing indoor sports have significantly worse vision compared to the same outdoor sports.

My theory is because we look up close frequently, our eyes become adjusted to it. As a very near sighted person I can tell you, I see much better very close (a few inches from my eyes) than someone with 20/20, like magnification. Try it. I also used a screen probably 8 hours a day even since early childhood (lol, 90s parents).

We are really well adapted for pre-history and there's evidence we were happier and healthier back then (murder/rape was common, though). "Sapiens" covers this fantastically in general.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Back when I first had to get glasses I had been spending as much time outside as I possibly could. It's just something genetic and has nothing to do with how you look at things. The reason our ancestors survived it was we lived in tribes and helped each other out.

[–] BagelEmbezzler@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That magnification effect is why I don't want lasik, it's like my little superpower.

Plus the whole eyeball surgery thing.

[–] Iapetus@slrpnk.net 2 points 12 hours ago

It's the smell of burning eyeball for me.

[–] childOfMagenta@jlai.lu 5 points 13 hours ago

Some research postulates it's the lack of sunlight.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 16 hours ago

Don't even need to take of my glases.

I would just straight die if i had to sleep a night outside where all the bugs and spiders live.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Before the invention of books, short sightedness was far less common. So let's blame Gutenberg.

[–] mEEGal@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

you can't possibly know that

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

There are studies showing that short sightedness is caused by focusing on close objects for extended periods of time. They’ve done numerous studies over decades on the increasing cause of it in children and it essentially boils down to the fact that the eye (when viewing close objects) can’t “unblur” the background (everything that is right behind the close thing you’re looking at). Your eye continues to try to do so. This continual struggle actually reshapes your eye, causing myopia, so your eye literally becomes egg shaped. Notably, the rates drastically increased when kids started doing more “near work” (homework) and spending less time outside.

So yes, we do know that.

Here’s a transcript of a podcast that discusses it, with linked citations at the parts it’s discussed at. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRMWnsM8thCF5giSiABkfCFUCxLzjM8PSby1V1Etn4jTavVpcuAwR0wjVhpZ2gLYK3QJUNzRYoiU9_p/pub

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 7 points 19 hours ago

It's not fair!

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 46 points 1 day ago

I have several different ailments that would have killed me a hundred years ago.

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

laughs in natural 20/15 vision, but quickly devolves into an asthmatic coughing fit and starts looking for his inhaler

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Not often but ..yea

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Every day, he-he

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 14 hours ago

my eyes are pretty shitty but I went 3 years without correction once when I didn't have insurance and I did ok. Being born really premature would have taken me out pretty quick though.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Along similar lines, I think about this for any post apocalyptic scenario that disrupts supply lines. Even if things are okay in terms of food, I regularly take medication that one would presume would be hard to get without modern society. In that situation, if I broke or even scratched my glasses, it seems very unlikely I would find functional replacements. I'm not physically disabled, but I am very limited, so in any real conflict I would lose. Quickly.

In prehistory or any future environment like that, I wouldn't last long.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

In most of prehistory (and still some parts of the world today), you'd have a tribe/society that would choose to help you and look after you.. Fuck, even herds of bovines do this to some extent.. It's kind of shit that we're letting the rich stop that from happening.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yep we have evidence in the paleolithic of individuals without teeth living for several years after they lost them. That means their community was chewing their food for them. Which is crazy to think about.

Not to mention there is also evidence of severely disabled people, typically from injuries, surviving full lives. These individuals mobility would have been very limited, but people jus took care of them. Because that's what you did.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

That last part would be of the biggest impact to me. I've had two major bone breakages in my life - my arm when I was seven, my ankle when I was thirty-four. Even over that time period, the treatment seemed to improve a great deal, though neither ever fully healed, which is why my mobility is limited even now. Even putting aside things like infections, I can't imagine getting a broken bone treated without painkillers and hope I never have to. Resetting a dislocated shoulder without was bad enough.

Also though, when I broke my ankle I was alone in the snow. If cell phones weren't a thing, I'm not sure I would even have been able to get treatment and it's possible that exposure could have made things much much worse.

Fortunately, I had my cell phone and we weren't in prehistory, so things went significantly better than they could have. Now I just have to worry about the future.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Infections were a big killer before antibiotics. We have vaccination these days because of the horrible things that used to happen without them. Just having clean warm water and soap readily available was a luxury back then.

[–] Booboofinget@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

And yet some missininformed people think vaccines are evil.

[–] Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

And then I realize I would have most likely died during birth anyway..

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Can we make this happen for all the science-denying idiots out there? Let's start with RFK.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Absolutely, yes.

[–] Papanca@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

My, aren't you a big kitty!...

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 0 points 18 hours ago

Natural selection? It relates on your thoughts taking off other stuff at night.