this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
1034 points (97.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

8565 readers
2771 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt Text:

Google photos on ios is literally a hostage situation. Remove key functionalities like copying an image or editing an image unless you give them full unrestricted access to your entire photo library. (The holy grail of surveillance capitalism data). Data extortion masquerading as a service.

OP

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Yeah, iOS is nuts.

Transfer files over bluetooth? Best go buy an entire apple product because fuck internationally recognized standards.

Transfer music to the iPhone? Gotta download one of two programs, make an apple account, and sync your entire library. Apple doesn't support common formats such as FLAC? Go fuck yourself and convert your entire library for them.

Backup your phone to the cloud? Apple doesn't let you select how many backups are saved so you run out of storage and get an upgrade to apple storage program for only $5.99 every other month/phone update.

I thought google was bad with their tyranny of default but the iphone 16 pro max is the pinnacle of anti user and pro consumerism. I list that phone as it is the only apple phone I have used.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think this is an iOS problem, unless the Bluesky post predates the feature that showed me this when I tried to insert a picture in OneNote:

Choosing "Limit Access..." lead to this:

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dont know that google even is the most convenient product for this anymore. The experience via google, microsoft, and amazon have all gotten so shitty that normal people I know are complaining about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Here am I, Gigachad, running LineageOS, PiHole and only using FOSS apps

Yeah, I've set up an Immich server last week using an old spare 250gb HDD and transfered my google photos to it..so far so good. I had been using nextcloud for a year to new pictures but the UI is not that great and I missed my old photos. Immich is great! Oh I'm also using lineage..with microg, a pihole and some obter awesome self hosting programs

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So are you rolling your own cloud storage?

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm running gos on a pixel and rolling my own cloud with nextcloud on my server. Works great.

[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'll look into nextcloud. What kind of hardware are you running it on? Any type of off-site backups?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am running Syncthing between my devices, which is enough for me. I wondered if I should in a Synology, but now that they went full enshittification that's not a question anymore.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Written black on white in 1998 so nearly 3 decades ago by Hal Ronald Varian, chief economist at Google, chapter 5 Recognizing Lock-In and chapter 6 Managing Lock-In with my own notes https://fabien.benetou.fr/ReadingNotes/InformationRules

Namely it's a strategy. It does not make it "OK" morally or ethically but at least business wise, we had been warned a long long time ago. If despite this been laid out so plainly and methodically we don't both individually and collectively, keep on using such services then we have to at least understand the consequences.

Edit: want to do something about it? Please do. Use https://takeout.google.com/ to leave then bring your own data in a system you actually manage, e.g. https://immich.app/ or whatever else better fit your need. If you still stay, you are giving Google more power to keep on using your data.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 107 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The irony of complaining about unreasonable requirements from an Apple user isn't lost on me.

[–] ecrevisse@feddit.org 41 points 3 days ago (8 children)
[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 53 points 3 days ago (24 children)

I don't know if the format really applies. Complaining about one corporation stealing your data while using another's product that does the same seems a bit pointless, especially when there are cheaper, better alternatives. The putting a stick through your own bike tire format seems more appropriate.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Nanook@lemmy.zip 66 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Why even install this crap?!

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 35 points 3 days ago (14 children)

People don't know. Researching good image backup/sharing options is beyond most normies. Privacy invasion isn't even a known problem for them to care about.

My parents certainly won't be able to comprehend this. My brothers are tech savvy, and it's taken years for them to come onboard with self hosting since I've started advocating it (one still can't because his wife finds it difficult to move away from Google photos).

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

>Uses applications from the most privacy-destroying ad agency in the history of the world

>Is surprised that they don't respect privacy.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

If you use apple images or whatever the fuck it's called then they have the same thing. Unless you do their e2ee thing and hope they don't hold the decryption keys for that.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (23 children)

Similar situation with WhatsApp on Android: you can't share images or videos without giving the app full access to your entire filesystem. You also can't video or voice call without giving the app full phone permissions.

Other apps happily let you do all of those things. You can just Share an image from some other app. But nope, WhatsApp just refuses.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Isn’t the point of google photos to back up your entire photo library?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 18 points 2 days ago

Stop using Google trash. Google is evil.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who do you think you are ? You're just extension of their machine. It's their photos.

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And their cameras. I can't even use my nest camera anymore. Because once Google took over they requested 24/7 access to my living room camera. That's an absurd ask. Not while it's on, but 24/7. Fuck you Google. Keep your grimey paws off my data

Am now shopping for home camera system with external hard drive

Don't use Google.

load more comments
view more: next ›