this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
322 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

72770 readers
2159 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A robot trained on videos of surgeries performed a lengthy phase of a gallbladder removal without human help. The robot operated for the first time on a lifelike patient, and during the operation, responded to and learned from voice commands from the team—like a novice surgeon working with a mentor.

The robot performed unflappably across trials and with the expertise of a skilled human surgeon, even during unexpected scenarios typical in real life medical emergencies.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago (5 children)

So are we fully abandoning reason based robots?

Is the future gonna just be things that guess but just keep getting better at guessing?

I’m disappointed in the future.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

reason based robots

What's that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"OMG it was supposed to take out my LEFT kidney! I'm gonna die!!!!!!"

"Oops, the surgeon in the training video took out a Right kidney. Uhh... sorry."

Really hope they tried it on a grape first at least.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

Okay but why? No thank you.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Naturally as this kind of thing moves into use on actual people it will be used on the wealthiest and most connected among us in equal measure to us lowly plebs right.....right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] catty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

so theoretically they could make sex bots and train them on.... so they perform 'unflappably'!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

If we go by that logic, some worker from your supermarket should be able to do surgeries

Doctors have to learns this much so they can handle most really unusual stuff, not because they have to know this for a standard surgery.

[–] realitista@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It does until it doesn't

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

My son's surgeon told me about the evolution of one particular cardiac procedure. Most of the "good" doctors were laying many stitches in a tight fashion while the "lazy" doctors laid down fewer stitches a bit looser. Turns out that the patients of the "lazy" doctors had a better recovery rate so now that's the standard procedure.

Sometimes divergent behaviors can actually lead to better behavior. An AI surgeon that is "lazy" probably wouldn't exist and engineers would probably stamp out that behavior before it even got to the OR.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's just one case of professional laziness in an entire ocean of medical horror stories caused by the same.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Or more likely they weren't actually being lazy, they knew they needed to leave room for swelling and healing. The surgeons that did tight stitches thought theirs was better because it looked better immediately after the surgery.

Surgeons are actually pretty well known for being arrogant, and claiming anyone who doesn't do their neat and tight stitching is lazy is completely on brand for people like that.

Eliminating room for error, not to say AI is flawless but that is the goal in most cases, is a good way to never learn anything new. I don't completely dislike this idea but I'm sure it will be driven towards cutting costs, not saving lives.

[–] jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i mean, you could just as easily say professors and university would stamp those habits out of human doctors, but, as we can see… they don’t.

just because an intelligence was engineered doesn’t mean it’s incapable of divergent behaviors, nor does it mean the ones it displays are of intrinsically lesser quality than those a human in the same scenario might exhibit. i don’t understand this POV you have because it’s the direct opposite of what most people complain about with machine learning tools… first they’re too non-deterministic to such a degree as to be useless, but now they’re so deterministic as to be entirely incapable of diverging their habits?

digressing over how i just kind of disagree with your overall premise (that’s okay that’s allowed on the internet and we can continue not hating each other!), i just kind of find this “contradiction,” if you can even call it that, pretty funny to see pop up out in the wild.

thanks for sharing the anecdote about the cardiac procedure, that’s quite interesting. if it isn’t too personal to ask, would you happen to know the specific procedure implicated here?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] negativenull@piefed.world 4 points 4 days ago

SurgeonGPT?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago

Hold on 3P0...you gotta little piece of human stuff stuck on your right end effector clamp top hinge pin. There, all good! Continue!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›