this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
82 points (86.0% liked)

Political Memes

5267 readers
2373 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

We didn’t like them during WWII either. For the first bit of it the soviets were aligned with the Nazis until Hitler turned on them. Then we just had a common enemy. We went right back to hating each other before the dust even settled when they tried to claim that we took Hitler alive and were hiding him.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fuck are you guys talking about?

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The right-wing love-hate relationship with Russia. Right now it's at 'love'.

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They're shipping Trump/Putin in some sick fan fiction.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know about every conservative, but me and every other conservative I know hates Russia.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I've known some anti-Russian conservatives, but unfortunately, there is a significant portion of conservatives, mostly Trump cultists, who have effortlessly made the swap into believing that Russia is defending White Christian Civilization against the Woke Hordes.

Memes are, by their nature, reductive, so if this doesn't apply to you, I don't mean to assert otherwise. My own mother is a conservative, if a somewhat odd one, who does not support Russia. But there is a major current of pro-Russian sentiment and 'neutral' 'just asking questions' coursing through modern American conservatism.

[–] gentleman@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Blamemeta Trump, his administration, the NRA astonishingly - remember Maria Butina and her boyfriend, the GOP operative?, "Sherriff" Clarke, Roger Stone, the traitor Gen. Mike Flynn, Rep. Dana Rohrbacker, Formerly of Fox News Tuckyeo Rose Carlson, MGT, Matt and Mercedes Shlapp of CPAP, Devin Nunes, and I could go on and on. I grew up during the Cold War and no one hates the fucking Putinistas more than I do. The Putinistas are all conservatives, or claim to be. Reagan must be rolling in his grave.

@PugJesus

[–] Lapus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US is exactly where Reagan wanted us to be. If Russia is required to maintain that status, he would have sided with them in a second.

[–] gentleman@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Lapus If you mean leading an aligned NATO from a position of strength, then I would probably agree, even though I'm not a fan of Reagan and even though Trump and is evil goblins did their best to dismantle US and NATO security, which Biden has built back with the coalition in support of Ukraine. I disagree with your second statement.

@Blamemeta @PugJesus

[–] Lapus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I was answering you, I really didn't convey my point well, actually at all.

My trust point was, based on his trickle down economics and being with the rich. I would guess in this time he would sore with roadies if that's what it took to get his agenda across.

As your answer is thoughtful and educated, I would be privileged to learn from you.

Thank you for not roasting me. I appreciate that.

[–] gentleman@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

@Lapus Thank you - I'm just a guy on the internet. Others in this thread agree with you, I'm not here to roast or educate anyone. Cheers, my friend.

@Blamemeta @PugJesus

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree, honestly. Reagan would've sided with Russia in an instant, especially if it meant getting one over on the liberals. Remember that he accused the milquetoast American left of having gone 'so far left they left America'.

Reagan's opposition was to communism, not to regional powers enforcing their hegemony over smaller states. Ukraine would be sacrificed in an instant. It's doubtful that he'd have any moral opposition, considering the shitbags he was fond of supporting.

[–] gentleman@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PugJesus That was a good line, but he was a very effective communicator. In my view, Reagan wanted what happened to happen - for the Soviet Union to collapse. "Mr. Gobachev, tear down this wall!" The US fucked up a once-in-a-millenium opportunity after the collapse, but that is another topic. After Vietnam, other than in Central America - Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras which were in our sphere of influence, no American President was going to meddle in a regional conflict. Moral opposition doesn't mean anything to anybody, but that is realpolitic.
@Blamemeta @Lapus

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree. The SovUnion was collapsing, and the CIA knew this as far back as the 70s. Reagan no doubt wanted the Sovs to collapse, and I have no doubt he genuinely pursued that goal, but he did little to actually accelerate the process. The Sovs were rotted out from the inside.

Let's not forget the Iran angle of the Iran-Contra scandal, or that Reagan supported apartheid SA long after his own party had turned against it. Not only that, but his meddling in Latin American countries went beyond the usual vile Cold War shenanigans, and into deeply disturbing - and arguably counterproductive - territory.

I disagree that moral opposition doesn't mean anything - realpolitik itself is a deeply controversial idea. Obligatory fuck Kissinger.

[–] gentleman@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@PugJesus In my view (and recollection) the whole point of the "star wars" project was to force the Sovs to spend themselves into collapse, which they did. That is why Reagan got credit for "winning" the Cold War. The Sovs were created on a false economic foundation - I'm referring to the forced collectivization of agriculture by Stalin as an example (not the human loss associated with it). So I think they were never whole as a point to rot from.

To be clear, I'm not a fan of Reagan and never was. He was out of control in Latin America, supported the Shah, lots of bad things. Realpolitik has been controversial for many years but I used the term as a description of how things are. And I agree - fuck Kissinger. The last thing we need is that guy negotiating on his own with his "old friend" in China.

Have a good evening.

@Blamemeta @Lapus

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

You too, mate! Always a pleasure to have a civil discussion about history.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, are you on Mastodon? Is that why you added the @Blamemeta?

[–] gentleman@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

@Blamemeta No, not on Mastodon. Just showed up when I replied earlier. No idea why

@PugJesus @Blamemeta