this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
13 points (93.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

29447 readers
1816 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

"We've ignored all the meaningful terms you were searching for. Now here's a bunch of pinterest and quora spam."

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Half the time I look at a website or article it is just AI generated crap anyway. Oh you want a product review? Here are a half dozen articles that have summarised the Amazon reviews of an item, with no first hand experience.

[–] DrMango@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google "Best vacuum cleaner"

Top 6 hits: "We evaluated the 5 brands that paid us the most and found that they all suck up your dirt. We can't really speak ill of any of them because this is an ad and we signed a contract. Please use our embedded links so we can have more money."

[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What's worse is most of what comes up isn't even a hands on review, it's literally someone doing what I just did, which is type "vacuum cleaner" into Amazon and see what came up. Then they give it reviews based on the bullshit in the description.

I want a review from someone who sees these everyday and has a deep hatred of every vacuum in existence. He's the one who knows that such and such used to be good until they replaced this part with plastic because they have a new CEO, and now it's no better than a dirt devil.

At least with vacuums however, there's a few guys out there with carpet swathes, children, and dogs at home that get to take vacuums from work and do youtube tests with them. Unfortunately they usually don't try to game the algorithm so they're pretty deep in there.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Search engine protocol:

Ignore first few results (ads)

Ignore next few results (bullshit spam comparison farms)

Ignore really annoying site you think is ok but is a usability nightmare

Ignore subsection of reddit links

Find 0-1 useful links on first page

Regret

[–] Shialac@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sad thing is the Reddit Links probably contain the most useful answers that google will show you

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know. But I'll use them as a last resort

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Use them, costs bandwidth and CPU cycles.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes but it will be offset by traffic boosts for advertisers

[–] drz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Use an adblocker. Unless, you mean people go on the internet without using protection?

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

They do. Either due to technical ineptitude (like approximately everyone's parents) or, and that might be worse, with the conviction of doing "the right thing," like a friend of mine.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Junk data that costs the advertisement without a return on investment

[–] BlueDwaggin@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really winds me up how results that match every search term aren't prioritised any more. I often search for very specific pieces of hardware, and it's been a nightmare since the late 2010s. You now have to pore over each result to check that it's 100% what you're are looking for.

SEO exacerbates the problem, but I'd say the root cause is the algorithm itself.

[–] Natal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have you tried putting your search between " " ? It usually helps improve my results.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Thought I'd add for people that may not know, the quotes mean exact match for what's between the quotes and only give results if it includes that term (unless I mixed something up). Whenever you click on Google's 'must include' it puts quotes around the term. Can be handy or make things worse depending what you're looking for. Worse is while programming and tracking a specific issue, unless they used the exact words you won't get a result. Better for part numbers if they never get changed.

Been awhile since I went into the nitty gritty of the searching functions so if this is incorrect please reply with the correct info, been awhile since I really had to think about what quotes does behind the scenes.

[–] BlueDwaggin@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

That used to work, but these days seems to do little other than sightly change the order of the same useless results.

[–] MrSlicer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The internet is unsearchable at this point. I feel like 99% of websites are fronts.

[–] Misconduct@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What's been pissing me off for years now is googling a specific company and getting a wall of advertisements for their competitors first. So. Dirty.

[–] Vormadikter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are "SEO spam tactics"? I would google, but am afraid of that now.

[–] Pepperette@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I just figured it out, Search Engine Optimization?

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Google popularized it and now it has ruined Google search.

[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Once AI is handling search for us, many may never learn the concept of "search term"

[–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"AI" is already handling the search for you. The big search engines are probably the first mass scale adopters of machine learning.

And they have lost the war with SEO spam to a hilarious extent. What makes you think the same won't happen with chat bot AIs? Bad actors (including PR agencies) will inevitably figure out where and how to spam comments in order to bias the AI models in favor of their agendas or products.

If the data they consume is filled with something like "fossil fuels don't cause global warming because XYZ", the chat bots will repeat it. They don't have the capacity to reason.

There hasn't been a reason to flood the internet with low effort spam because it's easily detected by humans who read it. But the ML algorithms will be a lot easier to trick.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Injecting stuff into the data consumed by LLMs is the new type of SEO.

load more comments
view more: next ›