How about water usage rates that penalize bulk consumers instead of giving them cheaper rates?
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
105 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
72156 readers
2533 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Woah woah woah. Those billion dollar companies are investing in our town, that's why we are giving them the equivalent of millions of dollars a year for free. -s
All water is drinking water if you're brave enough
Might be better to not allow them in the first place...
I definitely agree that if the logistics don't make any sense then you shouldn't build them there.
~Side note: this is also why I think Florida, Nevada, and Arizona shouldn't have hockey teams. It's an affront to nature.~
As much as I am the Florida and Vegas hater that I am when it comes to hockey, the seasons are played so late into spring these days almost every team but Winnipeg is going to be affronting nature. Ill give you that florida humidity and heat must really be the worst of the worst though.