this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
345 points (93.7% liked)

Futurology

2994 readers
82 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It's real goofy-lookin'.

I can't imagine it's a lift-versus-speed thing. Like how human-powered aircraft have the longest and skinniest wings possible.

Was it shaped that way just to do the quadcopter thing, which they've apparently not used here? I feel like you could just extend the nose so the wings are in the middle, and have a plane that's still plane-shaped.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Well that's one place we can agree anyway, trial and error are very valuable tools, they just need to be weilded carefully and not considered an error too soon. That makes it risky though.

I know i come of as pessimistic, and by a lot of measures i am, but usually only in comparison to the dismissive or condescending attitudes many people seem to have on the subject. Just build trains, duh... They work here, just do it there!

The backlash to poorly thought it arguments are usually people doubling down on their argument in the other direction, so I'd prefer to temper optimism and encourage actual conversation. Even if i may have trouble with that second part :)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›