this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
401 points (98.1% liked)

World News

47864 readers
4080 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 40 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

I keep getting this sinking feeling that this is all leading up to a precise and coordinated attack of evil.

Russia bombards the EU, the US attacks Greenland and Canada, while Israel finally bulldozes Gaza and Iran. China takes Taiwan and the south sea.

All at the same time so NATO is overwhelmed and can’t decisively defend it all without risking spreading too thin. No matter what happens, one of the bad guys gains ground.

I honestly have no idea if this is even possible, it’s based on a dream I had a few weeks ago.

Disturbing thought though.

[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 23 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Israel might bulldoze Gaza and maybe a few Mashriq countries, but it would suffocate on Iran. That's a fucking big country.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago

Graveyard of empires for a reason. They can try to OORAH!! MISSLES AWAY!!! Iran all they want, the resulting occupation will NEVER be a peaceful one, as there will ALWAYS be rebels in the hills and deserts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Israel, Iran, China, and Taiwan are all outside the scope of NATO.

Canada, Greenland, and most of the EU do fall under NATO protection though. It's a defensive alliance with well defined boundaries, member countries may have interests in other parts of the world, but since none of Israel, Iran, China, or Taiwan are NATO members it's not something NATO deals with. Unless one of those countries were to attack NATO of course.

Russia is in no shape to make war on Europe right now, they have their hands full with just Ukraine, and face economic collapse. Iran is in a similar situation. Trump has stopped his 51st state talk, but he's insane so you never know. China invading Taiwan? Trump is weak (he only talks tough) so you never know. But China is authoritarian and as we've seen of late authoritarian regimes don't seem to be doing well running military campaigns so it's possible they don't even have the capability of invading Taiwan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I can see trump believing something so stupid as that, and putin might saber rattle about it, but the majority of the world, and china/india especially in this situation, probably would not go along with it. Europe still has functioning nuclear capabilities. Putin does not want nukes hitting his country, full stop. China does not want a nuclear situation kicking off with their neighbor to the north, and knows that the US under trump would likely turn on them despite a war ruining both countries. India no more wants china controlling the waters to their east than the countries immediately around those waters do, and would likely cause issues, which china also doesn't want. As we've seen in the modern times with ukraine and some of the middle east conflicts and the india/pakistan border, nuclear powers tiptoe around anything that resembles direct conflict. The recent dogfight over the border was a pretty good idea of how reserved even 'open' conflict is.

So putin is likely not going to do anything more than a symbolic grunt at his western border, and china will just slowly weather down taiwan if the u.s. is withdrawing its influence. The idea of reunification isn't THAT taboo in taiwan, and the candidates for it gather a decent chunk of votes. If the u.s. starts acting like a bitch around the world (oh, gee, just look at what's happening right now), the sentiment towards it and china could easily see a rapid shift.

[–] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago

I agree with you, but my tinfoil hat is telling me to dig a shelter, preserve food and start making ammo. You know, for game hunting.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 38 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

If they're going to withdraw then why are they strong arming all the other nations to spending 5% GDP on defense? If they're not in NATO, who gives a fuck what they want?

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 37 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Probably because they want those 5% GDP spent for contracts with the 'murican military industrial complex.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

So, they wished the increased spending to the monkey paw and got exactly what they were wishing for: countries are cancelling orders of complex US equipment all over the world, and Europe is developing a military industry to compete with them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 11 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

But that's definitely (hopefully?) not going to happen if they pull out of NATO.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Never underestimate the corruption and stupidity of European politicians. "Divide and conquer" works like a charm on most of our corrupt assholes. See the stupid opportunist fuck that the Germans elected chancellor. His (our :'( ) government is pushing for the use of the Palantir(!) software from fucking uber-Nazi-piece-of-shit Thiel in German administrations.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

They're demanding it of Australia (not NATO, but we do have ANZUS) too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 60 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If the US leaves NATO, Europe would lose a lot of support.

If the US stays in NATO, they would refuse to support them anyway and could use their veto power to stop any potential action.

If they're not going to have the support of the US military either way, and the US staying in NATO could prevent the organization from taking any action at all, it may be in the best interest of Europe for the US to leave NATO so they can't cripple it from within.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago

NATO is a defensive alliance so the only thing a US veto would do is prevent Ukraine from joining NATO. But that wouldn't happen until the war is over, and it doesn't look like that's going to happen until Russia's economy collapses. At that point Russia won't be a threat for awhile so kick the US out, add Ukraine as a member since Ukraine would be a stronger ally than the US anyway.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 194 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

Look how stupid your country is, to hand the death of NATO to Putin because you’re on his side.

Thanks for the war and death and heat, Americans.

Fuck you.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 79 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

We're pretty pissed off at ourselves right now too. I'm sorry things got this far and wish I could offer more than fear and frustration...

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 67 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

What's next? Helping Russia in their wars? I hope it was fucking worth it to "own the libs."

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Next is Canada and Greenland, then on to Europe where I will meet big daddy Putin in the middle.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 6 points 11 hours ago

China could also attack Taiwan. That'll go much smoother when USA is alone and distracted

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Thanks to nato, america been bombing and organizing coup in ton of countriea with impunity.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

For the other nations in nato it would be for the best (imo obviously). Republican usa is not a reliable ally and the other nato nations have not all come to terms with that new reality yet. If the usa quits nato, then it instantly removes all doubt and the remaining nations of NATO can immediately start work on improving the alliance, instead of being stuck in limbo for a few more years while they're hoping that the usa will somehow magically unfuck itself.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

We already know all of that and work is already being done to improve the alliance among non-US NATO members. The US is already considered non-reliable and the only benefit of the US being a member is that it puts some doubt in the minds of adversaries long enough to build up the militaries of the non-US members.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 73 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

france was right all along

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 54 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This took longer than I thought it would. It seemed like a priority during trump’s 1st term, then it stalled.

Given some of Putin’s comments lately, he seems increasingly restless. I wonder if this is related to that?

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 46 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

He's preparing to attack the Baltics.

[–] Eril@feddit.org 18 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I would say the rest of NATO should be able to hold against Russia for sure, especially in its current state.

I would just be worried about short-term problems because of disrupted logistics due to the US withdrawing. Or maybe that other countries would follow the US in leaving.

But in the end, that is just my guess.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

Nato for sure can stand its ground even without the US. But Russia doesn't need to blitzkrieg and win huge swathes of territory in order to accomplish their goals of destabilizing the EU. Everyone saying "they're already losing in Ukraine, they wouldn't dream of opening another front" obviously hasn't studied Russian history.

I think the biggest deciding factor in whether this happens or not is actually China. Ostensibly, they wouldn't risk losing a huge market like the EU but afaik things aren't going well over there either, so if Xi wants to be the strongman Putin is desperately trying to be just in order to hold on to power, I can absolutely see them choosing Russia's side in a global conflict.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

The thinly veiled US exceptionalism that America is funding it. And their standard attack against other nations that they are welfare states taking advantage of USA.

Fucking assholes, if people are taking advantage of us. Then be proud we are so strong and rich that they even can.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 30 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago

Well, a Republican, so yes.

[–] korsystems@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago

Yes, please. I'm sick of my country working with these degenerates yankees

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago

Nobody cares what the State Duma has to say

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›