this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
314 points (99.4% liked)

News

30390 readers
3935 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Gas is already at $5.50. So when will we reach $10 a gallon like real Europeans?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

What's crazy is that the morning bell saw gas prices fall 9% from Friday, largely on the expectation that the Iranian response will be more limited than previously expected.

Even after a month long climb, oil topped off at $70/bbl, well below the $100-$120/bbl peaks of the last decade. This is in no small part because of a steady decline in global demand for oil over the same time period. Contractions in the post-industrial economies combined with industrial efficiency gains and green alternative investments have put a soft ceiling on the price of fossil fuels.

More supply disruptions illustrating the unreliable nature of international fossil fuel trade will likely accelerate demand for localized alternatives. And that means more investment in green and nuclear power, particularly in the big industrial consumers of India and China.

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's like $3.00 in my area

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

Texa? Florida?

[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

A gallon is 3.79 litres. Meaning that gas in your place is 1.45 $/litre. Gas here is currently 1.65€/litre (depending on octan grade, this is for 90 oct) or 6.26€/gallon or 7.12$/gallon at the current exchange rate.

Sorry to burst your bubble but prices aren't that different anymore - and these are German prices with quite hefty taxation

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

I just filled my tank up for $2.7somthing/gallon at costco today.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

No bubble, I assume nothing. If $7.12 is the goal, then so be it!

Jesefino Muktimory is already growing a fleet of Mexican donkeys for autonomous intercity package deliveries. They are controlled by solar powered rider boxes. Its all new tech!

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Geopoitically, the strait of Hormuz is sided by Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Oman.
Iran can't just close the strait without implicating the others.

[–] Deifyed@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Renamed to "strait of America" in three.. two..

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Renamed [gas goes] "straight to America" in three... two...

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 hours ago

Also closing it means Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain have a massive shipping problem, which would really threaten those countries in such a massive way, that it could be seen as an attack on them. Not to mention that oil is shipped to countries all around the world. Basically everybody who is not an oil exporter is going to hate them for doing it.

Also Iran needs to ship oil via the straight as well. Starting some conflict around it, would really hurt their income.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree, they can close the straight because missles.

However 100% of Iranian oil goes through that straight so what they are doing is reminding us not to blow up Khargg island.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago

There are no international waters in the "straight" (even.if there were), it would implicate other countries so, no, they can't just close it without implicating others.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 82 points 1 day ago

Gosh, I wonder what stirred them up?

[–] albert180@piefed.social 73 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don't do it yet.

The parliament simply endorsed it. The final decision lies with their security council

While Iranian state media reported that the parliament had agreed to endorse blocking the strait, the decision ultimately belongs to Iran's Supreme National Security Council.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn't it weird that it almost feels like Iran has a better functioning democratic system than the US does?

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Definitely weird, since it’s untrue.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)
[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That "are we the baddies" clip is starting to feel closer and closer to reality every day.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 14 points 23 hours ago

It was looking pretty real when Ronald Reagan got in.

[–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They're using what little leverage they have, and for once, without bombing or killing people. Surprisingly rational. Still a shitty regime, especially the way they treat their own citizens, but anyways...

[–] x_pikl_x@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And how do you suppose you close an entire waterway without killing anyone? You sit in canoes with a stick and tell people to pay the toll?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's called a blockade. And the U.S. has a long history of using it.

[–] x_pikl_x@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Which is enforced by threat of force using warships and/or troops that will ask for tolls I guess...

[–] MashedHobbits@lemy.lol 57 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Do Americans think themselves better for how they treat their own citizens? Because they lock up more of their own than even North Korea.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago

I saw some statistic here on Lemmy the other day about how most Southern states in the US have the most like detainment or conviction or incarceration rates in the world, only followed by El Salvador.

Our government abuses our citizens so fucking much

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 53 points 1 day ago

Two things can be true at once. Telling an American they aren't allowed to criticize any government in existence because their own is also bad is asinine.

[–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Not disagreeing, especially as of lately...

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

25 people were executed in the US last year. At least 975 people were executed in Iran.

The US population is about 3.7 times that of Iran.

Maybe the death penalty is a good deterrent after all. If your point is the Iranians are more liberal with how they deal with crime, I don't think that's valid.

[–] MashedHobbits@lemy.lol 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My point is that you’re both monsters.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude, 95% of the Americans on here aren't the problem. MAGA isn't on Lemmy other than a few trolls.

Direct your energy at the people in power, not the random civilians you interact with.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

By using this logic you can only live in an aristocracy and never a democracy.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's called anarchism, read a book

Or downvote, clueless dumbasses

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doing anything more would likely get more strikes from a war-hungry US administration looking for any reason to flex. At least a passive response might get some sympathy from the rest of the world...not that they'll jump up to do much even if the US does something else.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People sympathy never stopped any war

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The war hasn't started yet. Remember what happened when China turned off rare earth metals?

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

What are you even talking about!? Nobody gives a shit if they bomb or kill people. Raising gas prices will bring more military consequences in a week than you'd get for a hundred years of genocide.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 day ago

Where’s that goose meme

“And how are the using that leverage”

“HOW ARE THEY USING THAT LEVERAGE”

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

(I know it's silly, but the title of the next post made me chuckle - that's is def how people will think of this & not why do we even still depend on oil.)

[–] AlexLost@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So usually, in a fight/disagreement what have you, the opponents will use whatever leverage they have access to against the other entity. This is exactly the thing everyone said they were going to do and, surprise! They did the thing. Let's not pretend who the aggressors here are, much like in the Ukraine fiasco. Nobody is a saint, but there is still a "bad guy" vs people just doing their thing. Not being allowed to exist because someone else says nah-uh is just... kinda bullshit.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago

much like in the Ukraine fiasco.

Can you explain what you mean by this?