this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
436 points (94.9% liked)

World News

47728 readers
3838 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.ph/shFsv

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 8 points 5 hours ago

Dear Iran, leave us Americans out of this fight. Your fight is with trump alone, we are hostages of him. Thank you for coming to my Ted talk

[–] considine@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 hours ago

Propaganda is when you punch someone in the face and then quote them saying "I'll kill you" instead of mentioning the face punch.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago

And with how ICE is operating infiltration has become easier than ever.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 113 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean, yeah, that's what a declaration of war usually entails.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Mmm, not really.

You can't just slaughter civilians willy nilly. Well, you can, obviously, as shown by what's going on in the world, but international laws say you shouldn't.

Iran could legally intern any Americans, but civilians wouldn't still be POW's. And should technically have rights and whatnot.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

International laws have said you shouldn't since they were written, and not a single engagement has followed those laws. I disregard their existence as much as the people who enact war.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

To disregard their existence is to pretend they don't matter at all, which is incredibly naive.

There's no perfect compliance, no, but if they weren't respected at all and had no effect, the situations would be different.

For instance yeah, Russia has apparently brought out WWI style choking agents and used them. But there's no widespread use at least, and no mustard gas. Which would be more effective for Russia to do. But they don't, as they want to keep plausible deniability so that Europe doesn't gain an actual reason to mount an offensive.

So yeah, while you are right in that psychotic asshats don't care about them, they are affected by them nonetheless.

Basically ROE says that medics shouldn't be shot, but my brother trained as a medic and one of the first things they've we're unofficially taught was to hide their crosses on the battlefield, as Russians would literally aim at medics. (Finnish army.)

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 31 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump doesn't even have the class to declare.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

He also can't. Proclamations of war are made by the legislature. (Congress). If the President sends troops in a supposed emergency they can go without legislative consent for 90 days and must be recalled at that time without the legislature's approval. It's stupid, because 90 days into a conflict we have troops on the ground and an immediate evacuation only hurts us economically and global appearance some worry about. Not to mention the troops lost/injured, casualties left with those attacked and Congress not agreeing to keep them there is an admission that it was wrong, so not paying restitution would hurt international relations as well.

To me it comes to, if he orders troops on the ground, an immediate Congressional impeachment would be needed, and the Senate to remove him, or they will vote in favor of staying in the fight to "save face" and not care how many innocent lives die or are thrown into poverty, starve, are raped, wrongly imprisoned, tortured, and the damages it will cause to the mental health of a whole new generation of our soilders and people of other counties around the world.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You're speaking like you have a functional government.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The funding comes from Congress.... So either they approve it or are forced to approve it which they would have to recognize they no longer exist as an entity if the executive branch can write their checks for them.

So to save face, they would have to approve or impeach. Or completely give up the guise that it is a Republic. Their votes are public record. So the executive branch could make them up, post them and threaten them not to say anything.. but I doubt many of them would go through with that and not vote to impeach unless they are truly pro dictatorship. Some of them think they are pro dictatorship, but when you gather hundreds of people spending their lives/career trying to work their way up in power and someone says they are going to dissolve their positions/power and their chances of rising or having any say plummet.. they would be powerless if they chose to follow... Greed and self preservation would make them not want it.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

There you go again.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It used to be that non-combatants weren't considered legitimate targets. Ain't progress fun?

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

i mean true honest war does not have rules like that. the reason “rules of war” exist is so corporations can keep a labor pool and capital operating with minimal effect to profit. (“Ain’t no war but class war.”)

true honest realistic “war” is carpet bombs, famine, death, and capitulation.

stop expecting “war” to involve rules, you’ll only be surprised in the end.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 44 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

tell that to all the civilians in Guantanamo and Gaza.

if the first aggressor doesn't give a fuck about rule of war, it can't complain about them

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Putin has been doing it for nearly 3 years now

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Or Ukraine's civilians. Or the 500k--2M dead civilians during the war against Iraq. Oh, sorry, those were "collateral"...

Usually citizens are not considered fair targets. They're just targeted all the same.

Iran does not have the military capabilities to fight off Israel, let alone the USA. So they will most likely use terrorist attacks, targeting civilians, because that's the best hope they have to end the war: when the people back home get serious about ending it as they're taking losses.

Unfortunately, and as usual, the very important people who decide to keep going or stop are also the least likely to see their life at risk. And in this case, they also happen to not give a flying fuck about civilians lives.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

So they will most likely use terrorist attacks, targeting civilians, because that’s the best hope they have to end the war: when the people back home get serious about ending it as they’re taking losses.

Remember what happened the last time a major terrorist strike happened in USA? That's the number one way to get ordinary civilians of a democracy to support an actual war almost 100%. It's the kind of strategy that makes Pentagon say "yeah lol be my guest let's see what happens".

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Remember what happened the last time a major terrorist strike happened in USA?

The USA responded by attacking the wrong country under the false premise of "weapons of mass destruction "?

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The USA responded by attacking the wrong country

Not just one! They got Osama bin Laden eventually though so amazing success

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

Go explain that to Iran's leaders. Good luck!

On 9/11, the message sent was very unclear ("we hate you for your overall activity in the middle-east and the rest of the world" and/or "death to America").

This time, it may be very clear: "that's retaliation for the unjustified bombing of our country" (though Iran had its share of chanting "death to America", so yes, YMMV).

I agree with you, you know: more deaths will lead to more retaliations, from both sides. Someone has to act like a true adult responsible pragmatic leader now. But there is none in power on either side.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

In the history of the world, it has only been a very short window during the late 20th/ early 21 st century that civilians were not considered fair game in war, although they get slaughtered anyway. Even with civilians being off limits, as recently as WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and the Middle East, civilians have been targets either by design, by atrocity, or by proximity.

If there's a war, don't think you're getting off the hook just because you're a civilian. During war, the old adage "If your not with us, you're against us" becomes weaponized.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (7 children)
[–] the_wiz@feddit.org 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

As if the US have ever given a fuck who they blew up...

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Americans are always about how we hate the government of a country but not the people, at least this American is and all the Americans I know are, I know it’s not literally universal. To say “I hate the Iranian government but not Iranian people” seems pretty reasonable if you hate the Iranian government but for them to turn around and basically say “well I consider all American entities, including completely powerless civilians free game” is fucked I’m no matter how you look at it. Like wtf more do you want from me? I vote against this, have for decades, I protest against this have been since W was in office, I donate money and energy to war torn countries, I’m absolutely against bombing any country why exactly am I considered fair game?? Fuck anyone who lumps entire countries of people into a single hive-mind that serves its leader, a fraudulent one no less

[–] the_wiz@feddit.org 8 points 13 hours ago

Well, do yourself what you would expect other people in a rogue state to do. How many cries of "the Russians should overthrow the government!" were there?

Or to bring in a parable: What would you have expected from the average German citizen in 1939?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 9 points 17 hours ago

We're like Pokémon! Everyone everywhere wants to catch us. At home they really want to send people to Guantanamo. Abroad they need to exchange us for people kidnapped in el Salvador.

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 145 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh good. Americans will die.

Trump will be fine.

But Americans are gonna die.

Trump is a traitor Nazi.

[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they can blow up his hotels and golf courses. He'd actually care more.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

More Americans died of Covid than in any war the US was involved since it became a country, yes including the Civil War. The highest death estimate for the Civil War puts it around 750 000 deaths while around 1 200 000 died due to Covid. Most Americans don't really care about the deaths of their fellow countrymen since, you know, they elected him again.

Fun Fact (I know it's not that fun): The number of people that died of Covid approaches the total number of people that died in all conflicts the US was involved from 1775 to 2019: 1 300 000 war dead versus 1 200 000 Covid dead

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The headline is somewhat misleading. Iran said US personnel are legitimate targets (meaning those employed by the US government. Not all US citizens.

Although if I were American I would not risk depending on the judgment of a random Iranian soldier.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

First sentence:

Iran announced Sunday that any American civilian or military personnel in the region are now considered legitimate targets

So yes, still not all Americans, but no, not just government employees, American civilians too.

But I suspect non-military people will be arrested, not treated as military targets to be attacked or bombed.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Based on that sentence, it even just says "in the region" so hardly "all" Americans

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

🎶 Everybody's going to the party, have a real good time

Dancing in the desert, blowing up the sunshine 🎶

[–] CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

WHY DO THEY ALWAYS SEND THE POOR??

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Politicians hide themselves away

They only started the war

Why should they go out to fight?

They leave that role to the poor,

load more comments
view more: next ›