this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Public Health

865 readers
15 users here now

For issues concerning:


๐Ÿฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The newborns lose genetic privacy at the start of their lives and we're one step closer to the dystopia of Gattaca. Next up: designer babies courtesy of CRISPR.

[โ€“] Hirom@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

That sounds overly dramatic. On the other hand, the article doesn't give clear information on health data processing nor does it address privacy.

There are reasonable way to implement it, such as treating this a sensitive health information, requiring informed consent of a parent to add a genome in a database (even anonymously), not giving the government control nor full access, just statisitical information.

[โ€“] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 1 week ago

There is going to be lots of fun who's the father discussions because of this.

[โ€“] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 7 points 1 week ago

I'm expecting this to be offered and not mandatory like other blood tests currently given to newborns. However even though it's optional, staff will promote it as potentially life saving. New parents with their vulnerable newborn are unlikely to say no to a free test. Anti vaxxers and privacy conscious will likely refuse, but it will be popular.

[โ€“] Kepion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Gee I'm sure glad we gave palantir access to all our NHS files, I'm sure they won't do anything shady with the addition of this data

[โ€“] frankenswine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

if this isn't the absolute surveillance nightmare

[โ€“] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

the US already does this. it's a good thing and allows expecting parents to make decisions about the birth before its too late.