this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
708 points (99.3% liked)

World News

47559 readers
3603 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Brett Wilkins Jun 16, 2025

Flight-tracking websites showed dozens of Air Force aerial refueling planes departing from military bases in the United States and heading to Europe on Sunday, fueling speculation of direct U.S. involvement in the widening Israeli-Iranian war.

Military-focused news sites reported that around 30 U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers were identified by flight-tracking software in what The Times of Israelcalled an "unprecedented mass deployment" to Europe.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

WW3 Here we go! 🎉🥳

/s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Well, so much for peace talks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I discovered this on another post comment but I think it belongs here more:

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=nCP3LZoxABs

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

>Error: access denied: denied by administrative rule

Awesome.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Clearly moon bears being transported.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Wasn't Trump the peaceful dove?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

No.

We had a lot of "I'm willing to make deals with anyone" rhetoric from the Trump campaign that low-info voters took to mean he was anti-war.

But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn't significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter). Its all the same neoconservative think tanks writing variations on Project For A New American Century for the modern government.

The idea that you were going to elect an anti-war president went out the window during the primaries. Vanishingly few federal office holders have shown opposition to attacking Iran. Less than what we had in 2003 against Iraq.

Everyone from Richie Torres to Mike Lee seem on board with a brand new Holocaust in the Middle East.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Everyone knew he wasn't going to be able to curtail democratic elections without the excuse of a war. This is on schedule.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I always thought Trump could curtail democratic elections without the excuse of war ... by relying on a convenient terrorist attack instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (12 children)

Good thing states control the elections.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

We've got an election in NYC right now, with a pro-Palestine Muslim threatening to upset Trump's close friend Andrew Cuomo. Weird that nobody is claiming this election is being threatened by Trump, given that NYC has an enormous stock of Trump/Kushner accumulated capital.

What happens when the federal and state government disagree?

looks at US history book at 1860

👀

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago

No US president is a peace dove. Between supporting proxie wars to police actions to declared war, they all end up getting people killed by bombs.

[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 67 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

This is basic dictator playbook, problems in domestic politics, start a war and problems change to foreign policy.

Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (7 children)

Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

The United Russia party has had a chokehold on Russian elections practically since the day the USSR was dismantled.

There's a lot more to their socio-economic dominance than Russia just starting new wars. RU controls the national media, they have deep roots in petrochemicals and finance and real estate, they're mobbed up, they have control of the military across the officer's corps, and they're embedded all through local government.

Putin could be the biggest peacenik hippie in Russia and that party wouldn't budge from its perch.

He's doing these wars because he's fascist. Not because he's doing 11D politics chess.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 29 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This is why I say Canada, Greenland, and Mexico are not safe. Added to the fact that all 3 countries have lots of resources the US needs.

[–] Donjamos@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't this cause catastrophic domestic problems though. I think the US would tear itself apart trying to go to war with either of those three. Greenland perhaps less-so but still incredibly distasteful.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 7 points 12 hours ago

They won't defend their own democracy. They won't defend mine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kayky@thelemmy.club 63 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Time to waste hundreds of billions defending israel while our infrastructure crumbles and our citizens still go without healthcare.

Again.

[–] dariusj18@lemmy.world 36 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Search "Altlantic Trident 25"

[–] thecoffeehobbit@sopuli.xyz 11 points 13 hours ago

Yeah we're gonna use like 1 tanker for that, 2 on a busy day. The 28 others are going somewhere else

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 49 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

And again we see old incompetent white men starting another war.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 9 points 12 hours ago

Chicken Hawks who wouldn't go when they were called, but will happily send everyone else's children to die for their oil.

As soon as HitlerPig starts his war, he'll call for a draft. There is no way my son will fight in a MAGA War.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›