this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Television

459 readers
660 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago

'Slow-burn' media requires the audience to pay attention. You can't build narrative tension on the second screen.

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

You can't get slow burn TV if you're gonna claim a season is 3-6 episodes. Slow burn needs time and current TV production trends don't allow for that.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

With TV there were only so many channels, but with Internet distribution the limits have been blown away on how many shows can be produced and available at once. There's more content now than ever before, and the way people consume that content has changed, too.

Streaming incentivises a model where new content is pushed at you constantly to keep you watching and "engaged" (because engagement = ads = money) and so the most important metric is quantity of shows, not quality.

I've watched shows I enjoyed that six months later I couldn't even tell you the name of, because it's a once-and-done watch, and then I'm onto the next thing.

With such high volumes of new content there's no opportunity to get bored anymore, and that has consequences for how much old content gets revisited.

In the 2000s we'd all have some series or other on DVD, and when there was nothing good on TV that night we'd go back and re-watch it. And that re-watch process built up both your own personal fondness for the show, and the staying power of that show in the shared cultural consciousness. Plus you could probably speak with your friends about shows because chances were pretty good they'd seen it too, which only boosts it more.

When we're all just watching things once and never again, and often not even the same things as each other, there's no staying power.

I also believe - my personal opinion - that this quantity problem is why right now there are SO MANY remakes, reboots, spin-offs, and live-action versions of existing movies. Even the big players are finding it very hard to launch new things that reach the audience they want because the market is so absolutely saturated with "content". And so they have to fall back on franchises that are already recognised and popular across a wide cultural gamut, things that cemented their popularity at a time before the quantity problem really set in.

It's strange times.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

And you also have to fight against the constant stream of hobby enthusiast content on YT. Between my fitness, cooking, car and maker subs. I cant get to literally all of the new content in one evening.

I can watch "generic cop show 47", "Generic Hospital show 82" or I can spend my night watching things I'm genuinely interested in.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

For sure. And youtube is going to be on the winning side of that equation in terms of developing a fondness for specific channels and the individuals who run them.