this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
147 points (98.7% liked)

Today I Learned

22728 readers
611 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

in the 15th century when the queen became the strongest piece and the bishop’s reach doubled.

I assume bishops were limited to moving 4 spaces? What were the Queen rules?

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Originally queen could only move one square diagonally and the bishop (elephant) move exactly 2 spaces diagonally with a jump.

https://www.chess.com/variants/chaturanga/

[–] Crazazy@feddit.nl 2 points 23 hours ago

IIRC move 1 space in any diagonal but that might be even before then

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Article says the queen got overhauled in 15 century to become the most powerful piece but nothing about it being the weakest prior.

Was hoping this would detail how pieces moved through time.

[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From the Wikipedia articles of chess and shatranj (old middle-east/south asia ancestor of chess), without checking their sources :

  • king, knight, rook and pawn move the same (except the initial 2 squares for the pawn, which were introduced later)
  • queen only moves one square at a time diagonally
  • bishop only moves two squares at a time diagonally (jumping over potential pieces)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Actually, it draws out the beginning of every game, leading to more variety in the mid and endgames. By the time any of your pieces limp their way into the enemies pieces the rest of the board will also have arranged itself into chaos.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yea, the alpha version sounds boring, at least we still have not gachapon in chess

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

A: Hello, yes, I'd like to buy a second queen.

B: Oh shit. Hello, yes, I'd like to buy two queens! My credit card number is 6.

That hypothetical takes place at a time when credit cards were a very new concept.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Standardization of rules

The modern rules and appearance of pieces evolved slowly, with widespread regional variation. By 1300, for example, the pawn had acquired the ability to move two squares on its first turn, rather than only one at a time as it did in shatranj. But this rule did not win general acceptance throughout Europe for more than 300 years.

Chess made its greatest progress after two crucial rule changes that became popular after 1475. Until then the counselor was limited to moving one square diagonally at a time. And, because a pawn that reached the eighth rank could become only a counselor, pawn promotion was a relatively minor factor in the course of a game. But under the new rules the counselor underwent a sex change and gained vastly increased mobility to become the most powerful piece on the board—the modern queen. This and the increased value of pawn promotion added a dynamic new element to chess. Also, the chaturanga piece called the elephant, which had been limited to a two-square diagonal jump in shatranj, became the bishop, more than doubling its range.

Until these changes occurred, checkmate was relatively rare, and more often a game was decided by baring the king. With the new queen and bishop powers, the trench warfare of medieval chess was replaced by a game in which checkmate could be delivered in as few as two moves.

The last two major changes in the rules—castling and the en passant capture—took longer to win acceptance. Both rules were known in the 15th century but had limited usage until the 18th century. Minor variations in other rules continued until the late 19th century; for example, it was not acceptable in many parts of Europe as late as the mid-19th century to

From https://www.britannica.com/topic/chess/History

[–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Checkmate in TWO moves? How? The quickest I know is four.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Two turns each I guess, so four in total

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

... to promote a pawn to a queen if a player still had the original queen.

[–] LynneOfFlowers@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To my undestanding chess is based on the Arabic game Shatranj, based on the Indian game Chaturanga, and in both games the piece next to the king is the "general" or "minister" which moves one space diagonally.

https://www.chessvariants.com/historic.dir/shatranj.html

https://www.chessvariants.com/historic.dir/chaturanga.html

[–] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don't even mention Archon. Chess with health bars ftw

[–] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Oh I loved that one as a kid. Any time I install an NES emulator on a device Archon is the first game I add to it.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They should update it to include legislatures, private military contractors, etc... It really hasn't kept up with the times, if I'm honest.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Modern chess would just be two types of pieces, pawns and oligarchs, winner gets all the marbles from Hungry Hungry Hippos except for 1 that we, the hippos, are allowed to fight amongst ourselves to keep

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I like it. But I thought we were the pawns? I guess we could be pawn hippos, but that seems way too OP. Can you imagine an army with a frontline of armored hippos?

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I thought about that, but I felt it more apt that we're playing a different game entirely. I also thought about saying we're just the board that the real pieces are marching on top of in their power struggles.